![]() Bill Barr Still Covers for the CIA By Cliff Kincaid – December 20, 2020 As Bill Barr is walking out the door of the Department of Justice to open presents on Christmas day, Kimberley A. Strassel of the Wall Street Journal tells us that he is an honest and upstanding Attorney General who believes there was no CIA role in the effort to bring down President Trump. Barr, a former CIA analyst, had come to the conclusion that he didn’t “see any sign of improper CIA activity” and that “The CIA stayed in its lane.” This is comparable to Joe Biden saying there’s nothing in his son’s laptop worth seeing. The CIA did not stay in its lane. The driver was drunk and the agency swerved all over the road in an attempt to take out Trump. Former CIA officials Michael Morell, Michael Hayden and Philip Mudd had all denounced Trump when he ran in 2016. Former CIA operations officer Evan McMullin even ran against him as an independent presidential candidate. What’s more, the list of those denouncing consideration of Hunter Biden’s laptop revelations prior to the election was dominated by the CIA. (see the list of CIA signers at the end of this column). Their letter was used by Joe Biden during the campaign to suggest the laptop story was a Russian plot. What does the CIA have to hide? Our 2015 book, The Sword of Revolution and the Communist Apocalypse, features an interview with a former U.S. intelligence agency official who explained how the Sino-Soviet split deceived U.S. policymakers and weakened the Free World. His perspective was a dissenting view in the CIA and intelligence community bureaucracy. Such thinking is evident in media stories about the “accidental” nature of where and how the China virus came to be. You are not permitted to believe that the Communist Chinese would deliberately infect the world. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence says that the Intelligence Community “concurs with the wide scientific consensus that the COVID-19 virus was not manmade or genetically modified.” Our intelligence agencies have gotten it wrong before. Did they get this one wrong, too? Or did they get it wrong deliberately because they are compromised by the Chinese? Strassel is the latest “conservative” media figure to fall for Barr’s nonsense. She also wrote a May 18, 2017, column about the appointment of Russia-gate prosecutor Robert S. Mueller, saying the former FBI director was “as skilled and upright as they come” and insisted that his name comes associated with such words as “integrity, honor, respect, order, discipline, honesty, fairness.” She added that “…nobody doubts Mr. Mueller will lead as professional an investigation as he is capable of conducting.” Another dupe was Mark Levin, who gave Barr a platform on his show to spout nonsense while failing to get to the bottom of Obama-gate. Barr ruled out prosecuting Obama and/or his Vice President Joe Biden for a criminal conspiracy to destroy the Trump presidency. Barr did appoint a special counsel to look into Obama-gate, but there’s nothing to report here, either, except for a low-level FBI fall guy. Barr dropped the Flynn case and made occasional statements about how Russia-gate prosecutor Robert Mueller had gone too far. He also made grunts and groans about missteps by the Deep State, especially on Mark Levin’s program. Basically, his message was that the Deep State was a little sloppy. But there’s more. Barr “makes no apology for declining to divulge before the election that Hunter Biden was under investigation,” Strassel reports in her column. In other words, he covered-up for China Joe and his family. Now why would he suppress that news? Perhaps because his former colleagues in the CIA were telling him that the Hunter Biden laptop emails were part of a Russian plot. “From 1973 to 1977,” says his official bio, “he served in the Central Intelligence Agency before receiving his J.D. with highest honors from George Washington University Law School in 1977.” I am not sure what “served” means. I would change it to present tense “serves.” The New York Times trumpeted the news that Barr had told Strassel that the CIA was cleared in Russia-gate. It said, “The Justice Department’s examination of the investigations into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election has cleared the C.I.A. of suspicions that it targeted President Trump and his associates, Attorney General William P. Barr said in an interview published on Friday.” The phrase “The CIA stayed in its lane” is now part of the history of Russia-gate, despite the evidence to the contrary. The Federalist reported before the election that CIA Director Gina Haspel is “personally blocking the declassification and release” of key Russia-gate documents in the hopes that President Donald Trump will lose his re-election bid and because they “could embarrass the CIA and potentially even implicate Haspel herself.” “Haspel has repeatedly lied to the president about the status of documents to be declassified,” one intelligence community source told the publication. When Trump nominated Haspel for the position, the White House said she had “gained widespread support from former intelligence and national security officials,” many of whom opposed Trump. The White House cited these “facts,” among others:
The White House was trying to feed the beast, to appease the Deep State. The CIA returned the favor by branding the incriminating Hunter Biden laptop emails as a Russian plot. And Barr has the audacity to say the agency “stayed in its lane.” Let’s take a look at the admitted CIA names on the list of those denouncing consideration of Hunter Biden’s laptop revelations prior to the election (Remember that they signed a letter for Joe Biden suggesting the laptop story was a Russian plot):
In addition, reported the letter signers, there were “nine additional former IC [Intelligence Community] officers who cannot be named publicly” and “also support the arguments in this letter.” Remember these CIA and Intelligence Community people signed a letter designed to usher China Joe Biden into the White House by claiming that the story of the Hunter Biden laptop emails, suppressed by Big Tech, had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” Using the Wall Street Journal columnist Strassel as a mouthpiece, Bill Barr says the CIA stayed in its lane. If true, that’s frightening. It means they’re trying to bring to power a pawn of the Communist Chinese. Trump must resist by any means necessary.
1 Comment
![]() It’s Time to Expose and Punish Traitors By Cliff Kincaid – December 18, 2020 Although we believe the CIA and FBI should be abolished completely, as a result of their roles in subverting the Trump presidency, America’s Survival, Inc. (ASI) has campaigned to save the NSA from congressional restrictions that would undermine its surveillance programs. This stand has not been popular in left-wing and some libertarian circles. But it is the right thing to do. It is more important than ever before. The dramatic hacking of federal government and private networks demonstrates the threat. What many won’t concede is that these hackers, apparently originating in Russia and/or China, also have the demonstrated ability to hack into our electronic voting systems, and undoubtedly did so. As I prove in my 2014 book, Blood on His Hands: The True Story of Edward Snowden, it is no accident that the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the rise of ISIS, and cyber-attacks from China followed Edward Snowden's defection to Russia through China. President Obama called Snowden, a CIA and NSA contractor, a mere “hacker,” and Attorney General Eric Holder wrote to the Russians promising that Snowden wouldn't be given the death penalty if he returned home. Snowden has remained in Russia. When NSA analysts William Martin and Bernon Mitchell defected to Russia in 1960, President Eisenhower labeled them as traitors and former President Harry Truman said they should be shot. Investigations revealed that both young men had been members of the Communist Party and homosexual lovers. President Trump once called for the execution of Edward Snowden as a “traitor” who had “given serious information to China and Russia.” The Snowden case looks like the NSA equivalent of Philip Agee, who defected from the CIA and became a Soviet and Cuban agent. Agee died in Havana after writing several books with the help of Cuban intelligence. Snowden wanted to embarrass the United States and help America’s adversaries. It makes complete sense to assume that Snowden’s stolen classified data from the CIA/NSA enabled the Russians and/or the Chinese to develop the hacking tools in the SolarWinds case that is receiving so much attention these days. This firm served as a “security vendor” for government agencies, including the NSA itself, supposedly making sure their IT networks are protected against cyberattack. But Senator Rand Paul argues that Snowden is no traitor and wants Trump to pardon Snowden. Senator Paul is playing into our enemies’ hands and looks foolish. The booklet, Revolutionary Secrets: The Secret Communications of the American Revolution, is an examination of how our founders secretly communicated and deceived the enemy during the war for independence. The topic is the subject of an exhibit at the NSA Museum, which I have visited on two different occasions. The late Adm. James A. Lyons, commander in chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, wrote, “In all the hyperventilating over NSA's ‘spying’ capabilities,’ it is easy to overlook how critical NSA's intelligence-collection capabilities are to supporting our military forces. The information and monitoring of our enemies' communications is critical to success on the battlefield. NSA intelligence is a key element of planning any military operation. It provides the necessary information to our commanders so they can retain the initiative and achieve ultimate success in any conflict.” He asserted, “It was the NSA's intercept information that allowed Judge Royce Lamberth to find Iran guilty in Washington's U.S. District Court in September 2007 of the bombing of the U.S. Marine Barracks in Beirut.” It was on October 23, 1983, that Iran ordered and carried out the suicide bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Lebanon, killing 241 American military personnel. An Iranian drove the car bomb into the barracks. I attended and covered the trial in which the evidence of the Iranian role in this bombing was presented in detail. The trial involved a case brought against Iran by attorneys Steven Perles and Thomas Fortune Fay on behalf of the families of the Marines who were killed. The trial featured a videotaped deposition of a former terrorist insider named “Mahmoud,” who described in detail how Iran ordered the terrorists to attack the U.S. Marines and French troops in Lebanon, and revealed that the driver of the truck carrying the bomb was himself an Iranian. A message was intercepted from the government of Iran to its Ambassador in Syria calling for military attacks on the foreign forces in Lebanon, including the Americans. One of the highlights of the NSA’s history is the VENONA project which exposed a massive Soviet espionage effort against the U.S. that unmasked such traitors as State Department official Alger Hiss, Department of Justice official Judith Coplon, and Department of the Treasury official Harry Dexter White. I believe some of the documents that still remain classified regarding the John F. Kennedy assassination have to do with the evidence of a communist role in his murder that was obtained by the NSA and other intelligence agencies. This would explain why former FBI agent Herman Bly wrote, “…I believe the heads of the FBI, CIA, and President Johnson wanted the Oswald case brought to a conclusion as fast as possible as they did not want another crisis with the Soviet Union so soon after the Cuban missile crisis.” Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa's book Programmed to Kill: Moscow’s Responsibility for Lee Harvey Oswald’s Assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, details the KGB's disinformation Operation Dragon, aimed at throwing the blame on various elements in the United States for killing their own president. Over the years the Soviets have successfully confused many people about their role, blaming the CIA, the Mafia, the right-wing, Texas, oil men, or LBJ. Our media have not acknowledged and explained to the American people the substantial evidence that an American president was killed as a result of a communist conspiracy based in Moscow and Havana. The problem for the communists was the anti-communism of John and Robert Kennedy – specifically their anti-Castro intentions, plans, and operations. While we are defending the NSA against attempts to undermine its powers, its terrorist surveillance programs are in fact too broad, and need to be refocused. But the fact remains that the surveillance powers need to remain in place, in order to be utilized on behalf of the American people. Instead, traitors have exploited the weaknesses in these surveillance systems and the surveillance powers have been abused. The problem, quite clearly, is subversion from within. That is why we are demanding that top officials in the federal government, including the president and members of Congress, go through a process to get a security clearance. Former FBI agent Max Noel told me the Bureau used to investigate candidates for federal employment -- but not federal office -- by analyzing Character, Associates, Reputation, and Loyalty to the United States. The first letters in those words make up the acronym CARL. Noel said Barack Hussein Obama could not have been elected president if he had been subjected to the CARL test. But members of Congress also evade the security clearance process. A blatant example of this is Rep. Eric Swalwell, a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the subject of allegations that he had a romantic relationship with a suspected Chinese spy. Swalwell’s website boasts that “The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence is charged with oversight of the United States intelligence community, which includes the intelligence related activities of 17 elements of the U.S. Government, and the Military Intelligence Program.” Despite the controversy, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi won’t remove Swalwell from the committee. The cost of the American intelligence establishment has skyrocketed to $60 billion a year. What are we getting for our money? We will never get a handle on security violations in the U.S. Government until we order all of our top officials to undergo the security clearance process and demonstrate their loyalty to the United States. It is clear that Swalwell would fail such a test, and so would China Joe Biden. This makes it imperative that Trump stay in office as our foreign and domestic enemies are held accountable for subverting the recent presidential election.
November 17, 2014: Washington, D.C. news conference
“Edward Snowden has set up the U.S. for another 9/11.” For immediate release Cliff Kincaid [email protected] “It is no accident that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the rise of ISIS have followed Edward Snowden’s defection to Russia,” says Cliff Kincaid, president of the public policy group America’s Survival, Inc. (ASI). A veteran journalist and media critic, Kincaid has announced that ASI will hold a National Press Club news conference on November 17 to examine the disclosures that have put America and its allies in danger of further Russian aggression and Islamic terrorism on American soil. Kincaid said ASI’s scheduled publication of Blood on His Hands: The True Story of Edward Snowden, will be intended to counteract the Oliver Stone and “James Bond” movies being planned about the former NSA analyst. A comic book intended for kids has also been released about Snowden, in order to make him popular with kids. Just recently, the Koch-funded libertarian group Students for Liberty gave Snowden its “highest honor” -- its “alumnus of the year” award. Martin Edwin Andersen, the first national security whistleblower to be given the U.S. Office of Special Counsel's “Public Servant Award,” will also participate in the news conference. Andersen has written that Snowden is not a legitimate whistleblower and that he illegally “leaked massive amounts of national security information” and then fled to Russia, a police state where “real whistleblowers and investigative journalists alike are under continuous threat.” Andersen has worked as an assistant professor of national security affairs at the National Defense University and a lecturer at the U.S. Naval Academy. Kincaid said that “Edward Snowden has set the U.S. up for another 9/11” because of his disclosures benefitting Islamic terrorists. “At the same time, a significant increase in Russian military flights over NATO airspace is clearly the result of information stolen by Snowden and provided to the Putin regime, so that it can test American and allied defenses. These provocations, along with Russian threats of nuclear war, have made the world much more dangerous than ever before.” “When NSA analysts William Martin and Bernon Mitchell defected to Russia in 1960,” Kincaid said, “President Eisenhower labeled them as traitors and former President Harry Truman said they should be shot. In Snowden’s case, President Obama called him a mere ‘hacker,’ and Attorney General Eric Holder wrote to the Russians promising that Snowden wouldn’t be given the death penalty if he returned home. Espionage is not something to be treated lightly, as this administration has done.” The new Congress, Kincaid said, should hold immediate hearings into the damage being done by Snowden, his Russian protectors, and the Obama Administration’s nonchalance toward the on-going damage to U.S. national security. “By sheltering Snowden and refusing to turn him over to face espionage charges, Moscow is implicated in the Islamist war against the West,” Kincaid said. “This makes Russia a state sponsor of terrorism.” Yet, Obama officials won’t even use the term “invasion” when discussing the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Copies of ASI’s new book, Back from the Dead: The Return of the Evil Empire, will be available to all news conference attendees. The book includes information on the Russian-terrorist connection, evidence of Russian infiltration of Western governments, and ASI’s protests of the “Pulitzer Prizes for Espionage” when journalism awards were given to Snowden’s media collaborators at Columbia University. Kincaid said the idea, popular among many liberals and some conservatives, that Snowden is a “whistleblower,” is not tenable. He explained that when the Wall Street Journal reported that U.S. military and intelligence officials said Russia’s war planners “might have used knowledge about the U.S.’s usual surveillance techniques” to change Russian communication methods before their invasion of Ukraine, that is clearly due to Snowden’s disclosures. In regard to ISIS, a series of former intelligence officials have said Snowden’s disclosures have aided the enemy. For example, former CIA officer Bob Baer has said, “ISIS has been reading Snowden,” a process that enabled the terrorist group to evade NSA monitoring, capture and behead Americans, rapidly expand, and then take over large areas of territory in the Middle East. A study of terrorist communications found changes after the Snowden disclosures. In addition to helping Russia and ISIS, Kincaid said Snowden’s disclosures have been designed to undermine the U.S.-Israeli intelligence-sharing relationship and to alert Communist China’s Huawei to NSA attempts to monitor the firm’s involvement with the Chinese government. Labeled a national security threat to the U.S. by the House Intelligence Committee in a 2012 report, Huawei has been implicated in the mysterious circumstances surrounding the murder of an American citizen in Singapore, Dr. Shane Truman Todd, also in 2012. America’s Survival, Inc. Television on Roku recently featured an interview with Mary Todd, Shane’s mother, and Christina Villegas, his cousin, the authors of Hard Drive, about the murder and cover-up. Roku, which is in 10 million homes and available in many foreign countries, is an alternative method of providing news, entertainment, and information. It enables consumers to bypass cable and satellite programming, using Internet connections and their own computers. Many experts believe Roku is destined to replace traditional cable television. America’s Survival Television is one of the most popular TV channels in the category of news and information. The news conference will be held on November 17 at 1:00 p.m. in the Zenger room of the National Press Club, 529 14th St. NW, 13th Floor, Washington, DC 20045. November 17, 2014 Statement on the Edward Snowden Matter by Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa
Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa, the highest-ranking official ever to have defected from the former Soviet bloc, served as acting chief of communist Romania’s espionage service and top adviser to President Nicolae Ceausescu. “The United States has been a beacon for the whole free world, but it is not a perfect country. As another proud American once put it, America, like all nations, is a collection of human beings, and human beings are notorious for occasionally making bad decisions. But this imperfect America has almost single-handedly kept peace, freedom and democracy alive in the world for the last hundred years. Millions around the world have been ready to pay any price to become citizens of this unique country. I am one of the few lucky ones who succeeded. “For reasons we do not yet know, Edward Snowden went the other direction. He turned up in Moscow, following in the steps of three other NSA cryptologists: Bernon Mitchell, William Martin and Victor Norris Hamilton. All three had unsuccessfully asked to leave Russia soon after their defection. After the Soviet Union collapsed, Hamilton surfaced in a Russian mental hospital. He had been missing for more than 20 years, but no one in the whole world noticed his disappearance. Let's hope that Snowden, who also damaged the security of our country, will have the same fate.” Dear Mr. Kincaid,
In exceptional times like these, to put it mildly, I'm extremely happy to see you've resumed your earlier video conversations with knowledgeable conservatives across the board. I listen to most of them as much as my time budget allows and I'm both thrilled by the prospects, whatever seemingly slim, for Pres. Trump to turn this around and save the American Republic and along with it what is left of the free world. I am deeply worried about the horrifying possibility of all of us entering a merciless (in fact, Satanic) global dystopia against which Huxley's Brave New World and Orwell's 1984 may well look like a picnic in comparison. So, I do want to congratulate you and all your freedom-loving fellow Americans who are presently working their hearts out to prevent what the Left boldly presents as a fait accompli for them from happening. All the best to you, and a Merry Christmas, as well! May America and the world in time wake up to what's at stake and restore what is nearly lost! Sincerely, Progressive Congressman Defends Father’s Soviet Ties By Cliff Kincaid on June 5, 2017 After delivering a powerful anti-Russian speech at Saturday’s March for Truth in Washington, D.C., the “effective progressive” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) threatened this reporter, saying, “if you talk about my father again you’ve got a real problem.” Clearly upset about a line of questioning that exposed his hypocritical anti-Russian stance, Raskin said, “Stop harassing me.” The exchange, captured on tape, followed questions about his father’s involvement in arranging conferences with Soviet officials during the Cold War, for the purpose of undermining then-President Ronald Reagan’s anti-communist policies. His father was Marcus Raskin, a former Kennedy administration official who was a founder of the Marxist Institute for Policy Studies (IPS). Regarding Trump and the Russians, however, Raskin has Tweeted, “We need an independent commission to scrutinize Trump’s pervasive staff infection.” It was a clever line he repeated in his speech. Described by the liberal press as an “open humanist” with atheistic beliefs, Rep. Raskin seemed to threaten this writer with some kind of undefined action and asserted, “I don’t know who you are, but you’re deranged.” Walking away in disgust when I further questioned his father’s involvement with Soviet officials, he told me, “Go work for Donald Trump.” My press credentials were hanging around my neck where he could see them. A vice chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Raskin refused to engage in any extended substantive discussion with this writer, and his press secretary gave me his business card, hoping that would satisfy me and I would go away. I didn’t. As I stood by, Raskin spoke French with a French broadcaster for several minutes, apparently repeating his allegations that the Russians had intervened against the successful pro-European candidate, Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric Macron, in the recent French presidential election. Raskin’s own particular “March for Truth” consisted of marching away in anger and disgust when I pressed him about his father’s ties to the Russians and the nature of his father’s think tank, the IPS. The record is clear. In the 1980s, in order to undermine Reagan’s defense buildup, Marcus Raskin and the IPS planned several conferences with Soviet officials believed to be under the influence or control of the Soviet intelligence services. At the time, 12 members of the U.S. Senate and 70 members of the House wrote to Secretary of State George Shultz, warning that the Soviet Union would use the events for intelligence purposes. IPS subservience to the agenda of the Soviet Union and its client state was a major topic of concern to those backing Reagan’s anti-Soviet policies. Journalist and author Brian Crozier wrote in National Review that the IPS was “the perfect intellectual front for Soviet activities which would be resisted if they were to originate openly from the KGB.” S. Steven Powell’s book on the IPS, Covert Cadre,includes photographs of identified Soviet agents who attended IPS functions or associated with IPS personalities. He names two as KGB officers. The IPS even hosted convicted Soviet spy Alger Hiss. It regarded him as innocent and launched a series of “Alger Hiss lectures” in 2002, after receiving a bequest from the estate of Alger and Isabel Johnson Hiss. Ironically, Rep. Raskin used his D.C. speech to denounce the Russians for using “active measures” or influence operations against the United States, the same kind that his own father’s organization facilitated. In his heated speech to the “March for Truth” crowd of about 1,000 people, Raskin attacked President Trump and other administration officials as Russian agents or dupes. He also claimed that former Trump advisor Roger Stone hosted a show on Russia Today (RT), the Moscow-funded channel. “He hosted a series on the Russia propaganda network,” Raskin said. Stone has said he appeared on the channel but didn’t host a show. Later, when I asked Raskin for his opinion on Thom Hartmann and Ed Schultz, two progressives who do host shows on RT, he claimed ignorance, saying, “Drop me a note.” When I pressed him on the matter, he said they were “private citizens” and not government officials. As more proof of rank hypocrisy on the part of the rally organizers and speakers, evidence shows that Hartmann is on the board of the Progressive Democrats of America (PDA), one of the “National Partner organizations” of the “March for Truth” demonstration. Hartmann, who has been paid by RT to do a show on the Kremlin channel for several years, tried to rip a camera out of my hands when I questioned him a few years ago about his Moscow funding. Raskin also demonstrated curious sensitivity on the subject of Senator Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) connections to Moscow. During the 2016 presidential campaign, Sanders, then a Democratic presidential candidate, appeared on the air with RT host Schultz, formerly of MSNBC. Sanders had worked on a pro-Stalin Israeli Kibbutz during his younger days and, as mayor of Burlington, Vermont, had participated in a conference sponsored by the U.S. Peace Council, an organization controlled by the Moscow-funded Communist Party USA. He is a frequent speaker at events sponsored by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), one of whose members, Kurt Stand, is a convicted communist spy for the Soviet Union (and later Russia) and East Germany. What’s more, Sanders and his wife went to the old Soviet Union on their honeymoon. But when I asked Raskin if Sanders should be investigated for his Russian ties, he was skeptical and responded, “To search for what crime?” When I told him that “collusion” and “collaboration” with the Russians, the justification for the ongoing Trump investigation, were sufficient grounds, Raskin was still not convinced but conceded that an independent commission might be able to look into it. In regard to the Sanders honeymoon, he asked, “What year was that?” as if it had occurred too long ago to investigate. He eventually walked away, saying, “Stop harassing me.” At that point, I was suggesting that Russian influence over his father’s organization, the Institute for Policy Studies, was also a suitable subject for investigation. The IPS still exists and today calls itself “a progressive think tank dedicated to building a more equitable, ecologically sustainable, and peaceful society. In partnership with dynamic social movements, we turn transformative policy ideas into action.” Raskin and his father also have deep ties to academia. While Rep. Raskin was a Professor of Law and Director of the Law and Government Program at the American University Washington College of Law, his father Marcus Raskin is currently serving as a professor at George Washington University. He is still listed on the IPS website as one of its “experts,” and” a “Distinguished Fellow and Founder” specializing in “Democracy, National Security.” Media ties to Raskin and the IPS crowd are substantial. In the 1980s, many journalists were so close to the IPS that they actually taught classes at the organization. One, Karen DeYoung of The Washington Post, told students that “most journalists now, most Western journalists at least, are very eager to seek out guerrilla groups, leftist groups, because you assume they must be the good guys.” That IPS class was held during a time when the old Soviet Union and its surrogate, communist Cuba, were destabilizing Central America and hoping to install a series of communist governments. Reagan had stopped the Soviet takeover at a critical juncture when he ordered the military liberation of communist-controlled Grenada. Today, DeYoung is an associate editor and senior national security correspondent for The Washington Post, where she covers the Trump administration and U.S.-Russia relations. “From behind the Iron Curtain has come one of the most amazing Communist documents of our time.”12/16/2020 “From behind the Iron Curtain has come one of the most amazing Communist documents of our time.”
More relevant than ever before, America’s Survival, Inc. released a hard-to-find copy of the 1961 House Committee on Un-American Activities analysis of the book How Parliament can Play a Revolutionary Part in Transition to Socialism. This is a how-to-book on how communists overthrow non-communist majorities and make democracies into dictatorships. The book outlines how a parliament or legislative body (such as the U.S. Congress) can be helpful in “transforming democratic nations” into communist countries. The author, Jan Kozak, historian of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, said that the “revolutionary transformation of capitalist society into a socialist one” can occur without violence and terrorism. Citing the case of Czechoslovakia, he argues that “our experience provides notable and practical proof that it is possible to transform parliament from an instrument of the bourgeoisie into an instrument of the revolutionary democratic will of the people and into an instrument for the development of the socialist revolution.” This is what is happening in South Africa today, where a communist regime is running the country by attracting and exploiting the votes of the majority black population in “free elections.” It is the case in America, where former President Barack Hussein Obama and his collaborators are pursuing a “Brown is the New White” strategy of overwhelming and defeating the conservative majority, accentuated by a vote fraud strategy. The strategy gave them a Watergate-style majority in the House of Representatives in 2018, the presidency in 2020 (through vote fraud), and a possible takeover of the Senate on January 5, 2021, in Senate run-off elections where vote fraud will also be a factor. Then, America will have a one-party socialist state, and the Republicans will be relegated to permanent minority status. From Jan Kozak’s How Parliament can Play a Revolutionary Part in Transition to Socialism: The new conditions which are the consequence of the profound objective and subjective changes in the world create also new opportunities and prospects for the socialist revolution, new avenues as far as the forms of transition to socialism are concerned. In a number of countries which are particularly weakened by the conflicts within the capitalist order, the opportunity has arisen for the workers’ class to place itself firmly at the head of great popular movements for national independence, democracy, peace and socialism, to defeat the reactionary anti-people forces striving for the maintenance, and aggravation of national oppression and exploitation, to win a decisive majority in Parliament and to change it from all organ of the bourgeois democracy into an organ of power for the democracy of working people, into a direct instrument of power for the peaceful development of the socialist revolution. Also, our experience provides notable and practical proof that it is possible to transform parliament from an instrument of the bourgeoisie into an instrument of the revolutionary democratic will of the people and into an instrument for the development of the socialist revolution. Distributed by America’s Survival, Inc., Cliff Kincaid, President P.O. Box 146, Owings, MD 20736. www.usasurvival.org [email protected] 16 Dec 2020
Source: Inkatha Freedom Party, No.2 Durban Club Place Durban 4001 IFP: FARM MURDERS CONTINUE TO EXACT UNACCEPTABLE TOLL The IFP yet again calls on government to step up their efforts in the fight against farm murders. The IFP's call comes after a family of three, as well as an 85-year-old man, were killed in two separate farm attacks in Bishopstowe in KwaZulu-Natal over the course of three days. The ongoing spate of farm murders, particularly in KwaZulu-Natal, continue to exact an unacceptable toll. Not only is there an unacceptable and tragic loss of life, but also an additional negative impact upon organised agriculture, and food security. Government and the SAPS pay visits to these often violent scenes, and have made commitment upon commitment to allocate additional resources and manpower to counteract this scourge, yet we continue to receive reports of farm attacks, and read of farmers and farm workers being slaughtered, almost on a daily basis. The inability of government to deal decisively with farm murders could leave the farming community convinced that there is an organised campaign to purge them from the land, or an attempt to exact racial revenge for the wrongs committed during the days of apartheid. We urgently appeal to the government - and especially the police - to acknowledge the importance of the safety of people in the rural areas, and specifically, the protection of farm owners and employees. Government and the police must do everything within their power, and use all means at their disposal, to prevent the current situation from escalating. We call on the police to increase visibility in rural areas, and urge farmers to take every possible safety precaution. There is already a crisis in commercial agriculture and these attacks are making it worse. If this situation continues, it will have a very negative impact on the economy, as well as South Africa`s food security. It is of crucial importance that the government prioritise the security of our farming community, instead of sitting on its hands while farmers and farm workers are terrorised by criminals. The IFP further calls on the KZN of Agriculture, Bongise Sithole-Moloi, to demand action from national government, and the task team announced by the government’s inter-ministerial committee on land reform in October 2020, to “deal with ongoing violent farm attacks”. The SAPS Rural Safety Strategy, which “aims to address rural safety as an integrated day-to-day policing approach by creating a safe and secure rural environment”, needs to be rolled out with immediate effect. The IFP further calls on the courts to show no mercy to anyone found guilty of attacking or killing a farmer or farm worker. - Contact: Mr Nhlanhla Msimango, MPL IFP KZN Provincial Spokesperson on Agriculture and Rural Development 078 302 4657 ![]() Is Trump Headed for Mar-a-Lago? By Cliff Kincaid -December 16, 2020 I thought President Trump was throwing in the towel when I got a (mass-produced) email from his son Don asking not for money for a Legal Defense Fund to keep his father in office but to put my name on a Christmas card to his father and the First Lady. It seemed that the last popularly-elected president of the United States is moving back to Mar-a-Lago. On the other hand, Trump's former National Security Advisor Mike Flynn gave a speech at last Saturday’s MAGA rally, saying, “I've been asked—on a scale of one to ten, who will be the next president of the United States, and I say Donald Trump. Ten.” Some conservative observers say big bombshells are needed to turn things around, in the sense of capturing media attention and giving Republicans the fortitude to take up the battle and keep Trump in the White House. But they already exist, such as the revelation about a top Dominion voting official telling Antifa on a conference call that the system was rigged against Trump. This has been dismissed as “unproven” by the media when it has not even been denied. It’s the Hunter Biden laptop treatment extended to election fraud. Still, millions recognize the evidence of massive fraud that has been discussed in various fora, including my own America’s Survival TV. In the face of this evidence, Senate “Republican” leader Mitch McConnell has indicated that on January 6, when Congress convenes to tally the Electoral College votes to declare a winner, Biden will win. He doesn’t want Republicans to challenge the fraud. I still hold out the hope that Trump will somehow use executive power or the Insurrection Act to expose and arrest the saboteurs behind the election theft. But the Trump decision to allow Attorney General Bill Barr to resign, rather than be tossed out on his big rear, suggests that Trump wants to go out on the basis of an uneasy truce with the Washington establishment. (McConnell issued a very complimentary statement about Barr, saying he "is one of the most dedicated and capable public servants I have ever seen in action" and that "For nearly two years, he’s provided wise counsel to President Trump and rendered outstanding service to our country.") Trump said on Twitter, “Just had a very nice meeting with Attorney General Bill Barr at the White House. Our relationship has been a very good one, he has done an outstanding job! As per letter, Bill will be leaving just before Christmas to spend the holidays with his family...” A “very good relationship” when Barr has been covering up the wrongdoing of the Biden family and his special counsel John Durham failed to charge anybody except a low-level FBI lawyer with crimes in Obama-gate? Barr should have been unceremoniously kicked out with the imprint of Trump’s shoe on the back of the seat of his pants. Obama is laughing at Trump. Appearing on the politically-correct “The Daily Show,” he joked that he was “able to get away with” not being born in the United States and seizing the presidency anyway. By contrast, Trump, a real American whose career was dedicated to building rather than destroying America, is apparently on his way out after only one term, since the second term has been stolen away from him by Obama and the other handlers of China Joe. Obama was on the program to promote a coffee table book about himself, his third memoir. It’s not clear if Bill Ayers wrote this one. At this late date, however, I am still hearing from Trump loyalists who think he will pull a rabbit out of the hat. One told me, “He has known what he is doing since before he ran for President! He has been so far ahead of everyone else and that is why he has won at every turn! You see, God placed him in that office to turn this nation around. We have one last chance to turn back to God and if we fail, next time we will not have a Donald Trump to bail us out!!!!! Why do you think they could not bring him down? JFK didn't make one full term, and he was attempting the same thing Trump is doing! Trump will succeed!! So don’t rush him. Let this play out and let all the rats land in the trap!!!!” The trouble is that the Trump loyalists are NOT being hired by Trump. Instead, there’s a long list of Trump betrayers, such as Bill Barr, now described as a friend as he’s going out the door for Christmas to be with his family. Plus, all three Trump nominees to the Supreme court voted against his position in the Texas case to overturn massive election fraud. Attorney Jonathon Moseley tells me in an episode of America’s Survival TV he thinks this stems from fear of the big newspaper in the Washington, D.C. area, the Washington Post, owned by one of the richest people in the world, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, who does extensive business with the CIA. If one is not accustomed to the toxic poison spewed by this paper, you can easily be intimidated by this coterie of CIA propagandists. To make matters worse, there are some urging Trump to come to the aid of people like Julian Assange, a former host on Russia Today television, and Edward Snowden, the former CIA/NSA analyst who traveled through China’s Hong Kong to live in Russia. If Trump even lifts a finger for either man, it will confirm the claims that Trump was a Russian agent after all. The Deep State, which works with Moscow and Beijing for World Government and wants to destroy the concept of "America first," would be ecstatic. The Deep State would respond: “We told you so.” The way to get back at the CIA is not to reward Assange or Snowden but declassify everything immediately about Obama-gate and expose why the CIA and FBI were silent about Obama’s Russian connections (mostly through Russian agent and Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis) when he took office. Why Christopher Wray is still FBI director is anybody’s guess. Will he be leaving on cordial terms to spend time with his family, too?
|