![]() Murder Incorporated: Theirs and Ours By Cliff Kincaid – June 15, 2021 Responding to Biden’s charge that he is a killer, Russian President Vladimir Putin responded, in an NBC News interview, that somebody murdered Ashli Babbitt, a U.S. military veteran, who was among a few Trump supporters that went into the Capitol on January 6. With this reference, Putin successfully deflected questions abut the assassination squads he supervises. He cleverly moved the attention away from his former comrades in the KGB to the Deep State in Washington, D.C. covering-up for its own crimes. No wonder Biden didn’t want to stand on the same stage with Putin and hold a joint news conference. Putin is too clever. What’s more, the point that Putin made is a valid one. He is making it difficult for those of us who understand the vicious nature of the Russian state to maintain a critique of Putin on grounds that he exclusively represents Murder Inc. America has a Murder Inc. located in Washington, D.C. in the federal centers of governmental power. Speaking to NBC, Putin said, “Did you [someone in the United States] order the assassination of the woman who walked into the Congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman? Do you know that 450 individuals were arrested after entering the Congress?” He turned the tables on the American media and the American government. It is assumed she was killed by “accident,” sort of like how the China virus “escaped” from the Wuhan lab. But Putin is going further, alleging that Babbitt was assassinated. He makes this claim to put American government officials on the defensive. He has done so. If the murder was “innocent” in some way, we wouldn’t see the kind of cover-up that is taking place. Putin is obviously aware of the secrecy surrounding the murder. He knows that the Biden “Department of Justice” said it would not pursue criminal charges against the Capitol police officer who killed Ashli Babbitt. It won’t even name him. The U.S. Attorney’s Office simply declared that “…the investigation revealed no evidence to establish that, at the time the officer fired a single shot Ms. Babbitt, the officer did not reasonably believe that it was necessary to do so in self-defense or in the defense of the Members of Congress and others evacuating the House Chamber.” Attorney Terrell N. Roberts, III, who has handled police brutality cases and represents Ashli’s husband and family members, responded, “This double-negative is an odd way of explaining the basis for not bringing charges. It plainly glosses over the obvious problem of squaring the decision not to prosecute with the known facts. The actual evidence is this: the officer shot an unarmed woman who was not an immediate threat to him or any Member of Congress. That is inconsistent with any claim of self-defense or the defense of others, period.” In a previous release, the attorney noted, “The shooting of Ashli Babbitt on January 6, 2021, by an unidentified U.S. Capitol Police Officer was an unjustified use of deadly force which violated her constitutional rights. It is clear from video footage that Ashli did not pose a danger to the officer, or any other person when she was shot. Ashli was unarmed. She did not assault anyone. She did not threaten to harm anyone. There was no excuse for taking her life.” Another attorney, Jonathon Moseley, concluded that the shooting of Ashli Babbitt inside the Capitol qualifies as murder, or more precisely an unjustified killing. Moseley noted that the reports are clear that the massive, bank-vault-strong doors into the Capitol were open and pro-Trump protesters (and others) were able to just walk in. He notes some reports indicate that police gestured Trump supporters inside the building through the open doors. Trump had called on anybody going to the Capitol to be peaceful. Our media love police brutality cases when white police officers can be accused of killing blacks, but the Ashli Babbitt murder is something else. She was a Trump supporter. Attorney Roberts is one determined foe of government misconduct. According to his website, he “has developed a special expertise in the field of police misconduct and civil rights litigation. In the past two decades, he has helped dozens of clients recover millions of dollars in damages for police brutality and police misconduct, including a 2.7 million dollar verdict for the family of a Howard University student who was killed by the police. Some of his accomplishments in cases against the police were noted in a Washington Post article entitled Putting the Screws to Police Brutality.” By bringing up this case, Vladimir Putin is digging into the Achilles heel of the Biden Administration and its failure to seek justice. Clearly, he has ulterior motives. As a former KGB colonel, he understands propaganda. But Putin’s claims aside, there are obvious questions that have occurred to many people. Did the Capitol Police shooter reasonably believe he was in danger? Not likely. The presence of police officers near where Babbitt was shot must also be examined. Did they think standing there was a threat? Why didn’t they arrest her? The Capitol Police say she was rendered medical assistance “immediately,” so she must have been very close to the officers or other Capitol Hill employees. If the murder of Ashli Babbitt was not an assassination, the government should prove it. It looks to outside observers that she was invited into the Capitol, surrounded, and killed. *Cliff Kincaid is president of America’s Survival, Inc. www.usasurvival.org
0 Comments
Netanyahu’s Final Speech as Prime Minister of Israel
June 13, 2021 Transcript (provided by www.rev.com) Excerpts: …we brought a million vaccines to Israel. There are some people who say that we were obsessive for the lives of citizens...We could do it because we had a special stature. We were the first country in the world to get out of the coronavirus while many other countries, very many other countries, are still under restrictions… we have brought American recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capitol, the relocation of the American embassy, the recognition of Israel’s sovereignty in the Golan Heights and a change in the policy about the legality of the settlements in Judea and Samaria… We transformed Israeli into a cyber power, we built a fence, an obstacle on the Sinai border, which blocked an influx of illegal infiltrators from Africa. I think maybe a million. What would have completely obliterated the idea of a Jewish democratic state. It would have simply been abolished, and we also built an underground obstacle that blocked Hamas’s terror tunnels towards the Gaza envelope area… We have embarked on daring operations deep in enemy soil, from stealing the atomic archives in Iran, and other operations that surpass any imagination, and this is the place I want to thank the IDF, the [foreign language 00:11:58], the [foreign language 00:11:58], the police, who have done God’s work and preserving Israeli’s security… It’s not a secret the United States plans very soon to return to the dangerous agreement which my colleagues and I completely oppose. I heard what Neftali Bennett said on this matter, and now I am infinitely more worried because Bennett always does the opposite of what he says, of what he promises… I want to tell you the American administration asked me not to publicly air on our disagreements on these matters. We have disagreements. They asked us to keep them discreet. But with all due respect to our greatest friends and to my old friend going 40 years back, President Joe Biden…The new American administration asked me to keep our disagreements on the nuclear thing, and I’ll tell you why. Because the lessons of history are in front of my eyes. In 1944, at the height of the Holocaust, US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt refused to bomb the railway leading to the extermination camps, and refused to bomb the gas chambers, which could have saved millions of our people. We hoped for others to save us, and they didn’t come. In the face of the threat of extermination, we were helpless… from the moment the United States returns to the nuclear deal with Iran, the incoming government will not authorize meaningful operations inside Iran in order to prevent its continued armament… A government that is incapable of standing up forcefully against the international community on matters that are fateful for us is not worthy of leading Israel even for a single day. That is the incoming government. Iran understands this, too. No wonder they’re celebrating there today. They know that were it not for the efforts that we led, Iran would have had an arsenal of nuclear weapons long ago with the objective of eliminating us. Iran is celebrating because it understands that from today there will be a weak and limp government that will align itself with the dictates of the international community… Besides Iran, the second challenge facing us is to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state that will jeopardize our existence. The new administration in the United States is already resuming contacts in this regard. It is already demanding a settlement freeze on Judea and Samaria, a construction freeze in the new Jewish communities in Jerusalem… Bennett and his party are fake right, but there is one righteous man in this Sodom, Amichai Chikli. He is the only one, the only one in the fake right who remains loyal to his voters’ wishes. He isn’t the defector. You, members of Yamina, you are the defectors. How Clinton and Obama Disarmed and Abandoned Ukraine
By Cliff Kincaid – (Originally published on December 7, 2019). If Ukraine had kept and modernized the nuclear weapons it had inherited from the old Soviet Union, it is entirely possible that Russia would never have invaded in 2014. Those weapons could have been transformed into a deterrent to Russian aggression. But President Bill Clinton signed an agreement to send the weapons to Russia. These facts have been conveniently ignored in the current hysteria over how, why, and when President Trump armed Ukraine against Russia. History shows that Clinton disarmed Ukraine through a flawed international agreement with Russia and then, when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, President Barack Hussein Obama failed to send the Ukrainians the arms they needed to defend themselves. It was Trump who rescued Ukraine from the Clinton/Obama policies. Hillary Clinton accuses many people of being Russian agents, but it was her husband President Clinton who engineered the disarmament of Ukraine in the so-called Budapest Memorandum. It was an executive agreement and not a treaty, meaning that Congress had not approved it. It was signed by Ukraine, the Russian Federation, the United States, and Britain on December 5, 1994, and marked Ukraine’s accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) as a non-nuclear weapons state. Not surprisingly, our “fake news” media failed to use the recent 25th anniversary of the Budapest Memorandum to educate the American people about how Ukraine was set-up by Deep State actors in the Clinton and Obama Administrations to lose its nuclear weapons and then be invaded and occupied by Russia. In exchange for Ukraine removing its strategic nuclear weapons and sending them to Russia, the Budapest Memorandum confirmed that the United States, Britain and Russia “reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations…” The document was submitted to the United Nations Security Council, in accordance with globalist thinking, as if the U.N. would have a role of some kind in protecting Ukraine. The last nuclear weapon was removed from Ukraine in June 1996 and transferred to Russia. Finally, under Obama, Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014. It was another Obama foreign policy failure that has to be blamed on President Trump. Playing Politics Despite these foreign policy blunders, in the face of Trump’s actual arming of Ukraine against the Russian threat, the left-wing and well-funded National Security Archive has released a special report, “Nuclear Weapons and Ukraine,” treating the removal of Ukraine’s nuclear weapons as a great example of nuclear disarmament. The group sings the praises of the congressional legislation known as Nunn-Lugar, named for a Democratic Senator, Sam Nunn, and a Republican Senator, Dick Lugar. It was formally called the Cooperative Threat Reduction program. At the time, Ukraine had some 1,900 strategic nuclear weapons, the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal at the time. In 2012, two years before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, President Obama had declared the Nunn-Lugar legislation a success, saying, “…it was Dick who took me on my first foreign trip as a Senator -- to Russia and Ukraine and Azerbaijan. We were there to see the Cooperative Threat Reduction program [Nunn-Lugar] in action.” During that trip abroad, in a strange development, Russian authorities detained Obama and Lugar, threatened to search their plane, and examined their passports. A frequent traveler to Russia and the old Soviet Union, the late Indiana Senator Dick Lugar was one of the most left-wing Republican U.S. senators on foreign policy issues, having proudly accepted campaign contributions from the pro-world government group, Citizens for Global Solutions (CGS). He was Obama’s mentor on foreign policy and gave the Democrat bipartisan cover for his globalist policies. Speaking at the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Symposium being held at the National War College, Obama noted that in the audience, “We’re joined by some of our Russian friends today.” Obama went on, “Let’s work with Russia as an equal partner. Let’s continue the work that’s so important to the security of both our countries. And I’m optimistic that we can.” It sounds like Russian collusion. Obama concluded that speech by saying, “Missile by missile, warhead by warhead, shell by shell, we’re putting a bygone era behind us. Inspired by Sam Nunn and Dick Lugar, we’re moving closer to the future we seek. A future where these weapons never threaten our children again. A future where we know the security and peace of a world without nuclear weapons.” This was complete bunk, of course, but that is the globalist mind-set. It resulted in Ukraine being invaded and occupied, 13,000 deaths in the war so far, and Democrats gearing up for impeachment of Trump over policies that Democratic presidents put in place. Today, former Senator Nunn sits on the board of the organization he co-founded, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), working for a “safer world.” His fellow board members and advisers include billionaire Warren E. Buffett, Ted Turner, former California Governor Jerry Brown, Admiral Michael G. Mullen, USN (Ret.), and Igor S. Ivanov, the former Minister of Foreign Affairs for Russia. Funders include the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Canada Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development, the U.S. Russia Foundation, and Bloomberg Philanthropies. The National Security Archive has been funded by George Soros (the Open Society Institute), the Rockefellers, and foundations associated with the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Barbra Streisand. Another Scam The Nunn-Lugar program was supposed to provide financial assistance for the purpose of dismantling or safely storing the weapons in the old Soviet nuclear arsenal. But that’s not how it worked out. Citing various reports from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the American Foreign Policy Council charged that Nunn-Lugar funds in the billions of dollars had been “used mainly to destroy obsolete weapons that Moscow will replace with high-tech arms currently under development” and that Nunn-Lugar funds “have been diverted to fund some of this development.” It said Nunn-Lugar money had:
In short, Nunn-Lugar funds, which were designed for the "demilitarization of the former Soviet Union," were used to underwrite a Russian defense build-up. Trying to rewrite history to favor Obama and Clinton, the National Security Archive, based at George Washington University, said the countries had “successfully eliminated the world’s third largest nuclear weapons force in the 1990s – the ICBMs, strategic bombers, and nuclear warheads left in Ukraine when the Soviet Union dissolved in December 1991...” The group released “declassified documents” about the negotiations that only served to illustrate the inner workings of the bureaucrats in the Clinton Administration who made a flawed agreement that was violated by Russia and benefited the Kremlin. Not Worth the Paper It’s Printed On In a moment of candor, their report goes on to say that the Budapest Memorandum had “provided security assurances to Ukraine – assurances that Russia subsequently violated…” (emphasis added). This is the key point that makes claims of “success” totally bogus. If Ukraine had kept those nuclear weapons and had used them as a deterrent against Russia, perhaps Russian President Vladimir Putin might have had second thoughts about invading Ukraine in 2014. But Obama -- and many Republicans – had treated the Budapest Memorandum as something that might actually deter Russia. The National Security Archive goes on to say that “the consolidation of the Soviet nuclear legacy in Russia directly served Russia’s security interests.” That’s another way of saying it left Ukraine defenseless and basically became a jobs program for Russian scientists working to modernize Moscow’s nuclear arsenal. This is not something to be celebrated. It should be investigated and those on the U.S. side who negotiated this debacle should be held accountable. But that would expose the failures of those in the Deep State now after Trump’s scalp because he has raised concerns about corruption in the former Soviet republic involving Joe Biden’s son. Bypassing Congress Legally, Clinton did not submit the Budapest Memorandum as a treaty and the document was therefore never ratified by Congress. But as analyst Lyle Denniston notes, while the Obama Administration acted as if the document was in fact legally binding, the Budapest Memorandum “did not include any promises [from the U.S. and Britain] about how they would defend that nation if its territory were actually to be invaded.” Russia must have seen it that way, too. It was an invitation to invade Ukraine after the weapons were transferred to Russia. This is how the Clinton/Obama tag team operation betrayed a country now seen by Democrats as an indispensable ally. While the Obama Administration may have considered the Clinton executive agreement legally binding, the fact is that it did nothing to implement its so-called security guarantees. And the United Nations, of course, was completely worthless in terms of protecting the sovereignty of Ukraine. Academic scholar Mariana Budjeryn notes, “Using new archival records, this examination of Ukraine’s search for security guarantees in the early 1990s reveals that, ironically, the threat of border revisionism by Russia was the single gravest concern of Ukraine’s leadership when surrendering the nuclear arsenal.” In other words, Ukraine sensed that their withdrawal would invite Russian aggression. It would have been better to let the weapons decay in Ukraine than financially underwrite the process of paying Russia to take or dismantle them. Another alternative would have been to use American personnel to help safeguard the material. After all, Ukraine had access to the weapons. But pressure from Washington forced them to capitulate to a deal that benefited Russia. Once again, it was a case of Russian collusion. The leaders of Ukraine saw they were being cornered and a trap was being set. Obama failed to help the nation get out of the trap set by Clinton. But our media insist that it’s Trump’s fault that Ukraine is vulnerable to Russian aggression because he asked the country to investigate corruption that involved Joe Biden’s son. Meanwhile, Trump gave the Ukrainians the weapons Obama denied them. The impeachment of Trump over Ukraine is what the professional magicians call misdirection. *Cliff Kincaid is president of America’s Survival, Inc. www.usasurvival.org ![]() White Backlash and the New Tea Party Movement By Cliff Kincaid – June 13, 2021 Racism against whites has become official government policy. Not only is Joe Biden directing federal agencies to discriminate against whites, black-run cities like Baltimore (over 63 percent of Baltimore's population is black) are not protecting local businesses against violence and crime. With homicides up more than 17 percent this year, businesses in the Baltimore area known as Fells Point have written to the black city leaders demanding action. They report:
Incredibly, these are considered “minor” crimes. The business owners note that prostitution, public urination and defecation, and the illegal sale and consumption of alcohol and illicit drugs on the streets, are not as serious as the carjackings, shootings, and homicides “that have become routine.” Unless city leaders “do their job and to stand up for neighborhoods all across Baltimore,” they say they are “prepared to withhold our city taxes and minor privilege and permit fees and place those funds into an escrow account, which we will not release until and unless basic and essential municipal services are restored.” In other words, they won’t pay their taxes. This threat suddenly got the city’s attention, as “increased security measures” and a strong police presence were quickly visible. Perhaps white people ought to consider this approach in the matter of their federal taxes. After all, they are being targeted as racists who have to pay trillions of dollars in reparations. Tax resistance on the federal level, if it’s massive in scope, could force politicians to stop blaming whitey for problems in the black community. After marking 100 years since the “Tulsa Massacre,” which was actually a race riot with several dozen dead (not the 300 claimed by the media), China Joe Biden is coming close to officially calling for “reparations” to close the “racial wealth gap.” After more than half a million dead in a Civil War and $22 trillion spent on anti-poverty programs, some estimates for reparations go are as high as $14 trillion. Carefully ignored is the massive breakdown in the black family, with out-of-wedlock birth rates reaching 70 percent. Ironically, Back Lives Matter is dedicated to destroying what’s left of the black family. A statement about the destruction of the traditional family was deleted from the BLM website after it betrayed its true intention. The group was founded by three black women, Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi, two of whom identify as queer.” Cullors accepts the term “black weirdo” to describe herself. The word “Queer” used to be derogatory. Now it’s acceptable. Jared Taylor, author of White Identity, discussed the anti-white hysteria gripping the country on America’s Survival TV. He says whites are coming to the point, especially because of the impact of Critical Race Theory in schools, where they start searching the Internet for an honest look at the facts -- and they find his website American Renaissance. Taylor, who is moderate in tone, doesn’t blame Marxism for the rise in anti-white activities. Instead, he thinks a person like Patrisse Cullors of Black Lives Matter is motivated by money. She recently resigned one BLM organization after it was discovered she had 4 homes. Whatever the ultimate reason for the rise of anti-white hate, white people are waking up and taking action. Meanwhile, there are some blacks who have had an awakening. With Father’s Day approaching on Sunday, June 20, 2021, a former BLM leader by the name of Rashad Turner has noted the obvious – BLM doesn’t care about black families. Statistics show that in 1965, 24 percent of black infants and 3.1 percent of white infants were born to single mothers. By 1990 the rates had risen to 64 percent for black infants, 18 percent for whites. By 2019, that percentage had risen to 28.2 for whites and 70 percent for blacks. Oprah Winfrey’s OWN Network is premiering the network’s first-ever Father’s Day special “Honoring Our Kings: OWN Celebrates Black Fatherhood” on Tuesday, June 15 at 9:00 p.m. “We want to honor the Black Kings who stand firm and proud in their role as a father, and celebrate the love and joy they bring to their families and communities,” Oprah said. Those are nice sentiments, but what about the problem of illegitimacy in the black community? Instead, an actual article first published in the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, under the auspices of the Biden administration's National Library of Medicine, was titled, “On Having Whiteness.” It calls for “effective treatment” consisting “of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions,” adding, “Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness's infiltrated appetites-to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation.” That means trillions. But the backlash is coming. In response to a lawsuit from the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL), U.S. District Judge William Griesbach issued a temporary restraining order halting payments in a $4 billion federal farmer loan forgiveness program that excludes whites. An article from the establishment publication The Economist warns that, “As America becomes more multiracial, and whites lose the status of dominant group, their sense of racial solidarity may grow and the taboo against white pride may fade.” White resistance, however, could benefit minorities as well, by forcing politicians to deal with real problems in the homes and on the streets. So-called black “leaders” still have a lot to answer for. Barack Hussein Obama, who just attacked critics of Critical Race Theory, should come forward and admit that his own administration was the most anti-family force in U.S. history by celebrating gay marriage and the spectacle of men becoming women through the phenomenon of “transgenderism.” In response to Bruce Jenner, a biological father of six, declaring he was actually female, Obama said, “It takes courage to share your story.” Obama seemed to be endorsing genital mutilation as a way out of mental confusion or mental illness. Republicans could step forward as well, lamenting that the Bruce/Catlyn Jenner “example” is a terrible thing and that he is not a Republican in any sense of the word. Restoring the traditional family is a mammoth undertaking. Stopping the celebration of fatherless families is a good first step. As demonstrated in Baltimore, tax resistance when the government is destroying families and businesses is a good second step. It seems the time is ripe for another Tea Party. *Cliff Kincaid is president of America’s Survival, Inc. www.usasurvival.org ![]() (Above image from Cliff Kincaid computer, Microsoft operating system) Pride for Thee but Not For Me By Cliff Kincaid - June 8, 2021 I turned on my computer today and found a beautiful scene with a rainbow (above) and a message about “Pride Month.” It apparently came from Microsoft, which is offering a special browser for “Pride 2021.” The Xbox gaming system offers “Pride Gear.” Last night I was watching a show on the National Geographic cable channel and a big “Pride” message was displayed. “Happy Pride Month, Cliff!” was a message I received from the Democratic Attorneys General Association (DAGA). (The rainbow was traditionally a symbol of God's covenant with human beings, not with Sodom and Gomorrah.) I’m not gay, but can you imagine the outrage if I had received a “Happy White Pride Month, Cllff!” message. I am white. And male to boot. If you’re white, the only way you get to be proud of yourself is if you’re LGBTQIA. While gays are entitled to “pride,” morally straight white people are not. This is America 2021. It is reported that 400 companies, nearly 100 “women’s rights and gender justice organizations,” and more than 120 “faith groups” have lined up in support of the so-called Equality Act, a Democratic Party priority and pay-off to the LGBTQ lobby to further expand their special rights. The 436 member companies of the Business Coalition for the Equality Act are said to have a combined $6.9 trillion in revenue, employing over 14.7 million people in the United States. They include Apple, Facebook, and Twitter, elements of the Big Tech censorship machine. Nevertheless, RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel tweeted, "Happy Pride Month!” for the LGBTQIA community. For lesbians, it’s time for pride and alcohol. Michelle Levander, Director of the Center for Health Journalism at the USC Annenberg School of Journalism, reports the good news – “inclusive spaces such as lesbian bars are once again opening up.” Started by a communist, Harry Hay, the homosexual movement emerged into public view after the 1969 homosexual riots at a seedy Mafia-run bar in New York City known as the Stonewall Inn. Even lockdowns and isolation during the pandemic were not bad things, says Levander. She reports, “Lockdown gave some people time and space to consider their own identities without external social pressures.” One woman “embraced her lesbian identity during the pandemic” while some people who are transgender “have found it easier to be out and about while everyone is masked…” But white people may need to wear masks indefinitely, to hide their white faces. Coming up, the “Lesbians Who Tech” summit will feature topics like “Fighting for Racial Justice.” It declares, “Lesbians Who Tech & Allies is the largest LGBTQ technology community in the world — committed to visibility, intersectionality, and changing the face of technology. We are 70,000 LGBTQ women, people of color, non-binary and trans leaders, and allies in tech in 100+ cities worldwide.” To celebrate “gay pride,” the Center for American Progress highlights “a queer Muslim woman of color,” while Nickelodeon, owned by ViacomCBS, is featuring its first openly transgender teenage actor to star in a kids’ series. The Democratic DAGA group says, “This June and beyond, we honor the LBGTQ+ community and this country’s hard-fought (and still continuing!) march toward full equality. Here at DAGA, our position has always been: Love is love is love is love.” And STDs are STDs are STDs. While not anxious to highlight these facts, one can nevertheless consult the CDC website and find the following:
Facts are facts are facts. To understand how far we’ve come, recall that Robert R. Reilly, author of the highly controversial (and suppressed) book, Making Gay Okay, says the capitulation of the Republicans to the homosexual lobby was highlighted back during the presidency of George W. Bush. General Peter Pace was hung out to dry for expressing his view that homosexuality is immoral. Former Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman took to the pages of The Wall Street Journal on November 21, 2012, to make the “conservative case” for backing gay marriage. This was done when a pro-gay group called “Young Conservatives for the Freedom to Marry” emerged, with such notables as Megan McCain, who plays the “conservative” on the show “The View,” as members. Her husband, Ben Domenech, resigned as a blogger for the Washington Post after being exposed as a plagiarist. He has since been rehabilitated and regularly appears on Fox News. I gave a presentation, “How the Republican Party is Going Gay,” back in 2015, as part of a conference titled “Crimes against Nature and the Constitution: Cultural Marxism and America's Moral Collapse.” We saw it coming. Among the topics was Fox News funding of the homosexual lobby and secret gays in the “conservative” media. There is some fighting back. “RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel Must Go” is the title over a Laurie Higgins piece. She writes, ‘To have the head of the Republican Party celebrate the egregious sins of homosexuality and cross-sex impersonation should shock and outrage Republicans.” In a provocative Chronicles magazine, author Stephen Baskerville writes that conservative leaders have “forfeited the moral high ground” by not confronting the “sexual militants” who dance on the grave of “family destruction.” While embracing gay pride, the Republican Party in Congress resists white pride, demonstrating their priorities. Rep. Steve King of Iowa was eventually forced out of Congress by current House Republican Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy because King was outspoken in support of saving Western civilization and opposing open borders and multiculturalism. Of course, one reason Western civilization is held in such contempt is that it placed a priority on traditional moral values. While former Rep. King is persona non grata in the GOP, the “transgender” by the name of Caitlyn Jenner is running as a Republican candidate for Governor of California and gets favorable publicity on Fox News.
![]() Will the Deep State Remove Biden from Office? By Cliff Kincaid - June 5, 2021 The Deep State appears to be worried. Joe Biden is too old to be getting blood transfusions from young people, the current fad among the Silicon Valley elites, and may be on his way out. Bike rides to impress the media are not cutting it. Biden, the nation’s oldest president in history, and his wife, Jill, celebrated her 70th birthday with a bike ride on a trail of Rehoboth Beach on June 3, 2021. Even the Washington Post was not impressed, reporting that Biden “has yet to get a checkup -- or release an update to the three-page medical summary that was last provided to the public some 17 months ago.” That vague “summary,” written by a sympathetic physician and not “fact-checked” by any independent doctor, claimed Biden had no permanent damage from the brain aneurysms he suffered in 1988. Observers of the Biden presidency would beg to differ. The real president, Barack Hussein Obama, says Biden is “finishing the job” of his administration. That’s interesting on medical and other grounds. Obama, a heavy dope smoker tutored by a black communist, also refused to release his complete medical records. Obama should have been removed from office because of cognitive impairment. He used cocaine in addition to his heavy marijuana use. His adoring press, many of whom were also likely “recreational” dope users, covered for his reckless and dangerous polices, saying the worst thing about him was that he occasionally smoked cigarettes or couldn’t play basketball. The Post censored information about his debt to Frank Marshall Davis, the communist who mentored him. It’s also interesting because Biden, picked as Barack Obama’s running mate, was drummed out of the 1988 presidential race for plagiarism. That’s the same year he had his brain problems. The guy couldn’t think for himself then or now. None of this is of consequence to people who depend on CNN, MSNBC, or the Washington Post for information about the course of our nation. The brainwashing is constant, reflecting the downward spiral of our nation under China Joe. But perhaps the Post’s concern about China Joe’s medical records is an indication that something is being planned to replace the mental incompetent who carries the title of president. We can’t do much about the obsolete standards of the journalism profession, but China Joe Biden could be removed from office on medical grounds. Since the Post is an organ of the Deep State, specifically the CIA, the story about Biden’s medical condition may reflect official concern about his deteriorating physical and mental condition. The 25th Amendment to the United States Constitution deals with presidential disabilities. This amendment allows Congress to review whether or not the president is able to discharge the powers and duties of his office. If it is determined that he is not, then he can be replaced. Still, the Post covers for Biden, especially on border breakdown issues. One Post article about the “huge border influx” bringing fears of “a grim summer for migrant deaths,” attempted to portray Biden in mostly positive terms. It said, “Much of the Biden administration’s border response in recent months has centered on caring for the unaccompanied minors who have arrived in record numbers, along with parents traveling with children.” Later, down in the article, we find these facts: “U.S. agents took more than 111,000 single adult migrants into custody in April, the highest total in more than a decade, and the number increased again in May, according to preliminary enforcement data.” Some of these adult migrants are human traffickers who return home, only to start the process all over again. This is getting too embarrassing. "President Biden's open-border policies have paved the way for dangerous gangs and cartels, human traffickers, and deadly drugs like fentanyl to pour into our communities," said Texas Governor Greg Abbott. As a result, Abbott issued a disaster declaration along Texas' southern border, “providing more resources and strategies to combat the ongoing influx of unlawful immigrants.” Biden’s backers seem to counting on that fentanyl from China, smuggled through the border by Mexican drug gangs, to keep killing the deplorables. The heroin epidemic disproportionately affects white communities devastated by bad trade deals, open borders and the Democratic Party’s anti-industrial policies. Biden is pushing those same anti-industrial policies while approving Putin’s gas pipeline to Europe. As China Joe prepares to meet former KGB Lt. Col. Vladimir Putin, the FBI has issued a vague and mostly useless statement on the cyberattack on JBS, the world's largest meat supplier, saying, “We have attributed the JBS attack to REvil and Sodinokibi and are working diligently to bring the threat actors to justice.” These groups are said to be “linked” to Russia. But Biden will still meet with Putin, according to his mouthpiece CNN, and will “discuss” the topic with him. While the FBI is working “diligently” to stop cyberattacks, which continue, it looks like the FBI has also been sniffing around conservatives and Christian Americans, attempting to find “extremists.” The pro-family group MassResistance reports that FBI agents come unannounced to the home of its Organization Director, Arthur Schaper, to interrogate him. It said two FBI agents flashed their IDs, identified themselves as “special agents,” and started asking him questions like: “We're following up on leads from DC. We're just curious if you went to DC or if you knew anybody who had gone to DC, and if you'd be willing to talk to us about any of that.” Schaper answered, “I did not go to DC. But honestly, I think this is a massive abuse of power which you guys are doing. It’s disgusting. I want to have a lawyer with me before I talk to you. You guys are violating the Constitution.” “This is not the America we once knew,” says MassResistance. An America like this cannot survive very long. Even the Deep State seems worried about Biden staying the course.
How the Communists Outsmarted Us By Cliff Kincaid – June 2, 2021 Under no circumstances are we permitted to believe the Chinese Communist Party deliberately unleashed the coronavirus weapon on the world. We are supposed to believe it was an “accident.” We are also told not to notice that Chinese, Maoist, and other Communist organizations are behind the Black Lives Matter (BLM) riots in American cities. (The details are in veteran researcher Jim Simpson’s new book, Who Was Karl Marx?). Meanwhile, a new China virus has been detected, according to reports. As Red China goes in for the kill, our media are flip-flopping on the nature of the virus. A Wall Street Journal article from last September, “‘Really Diabolical’: Inside the Coronavirus That Outsmarted Science,” said SARS-CoV-2 was a virus with mysterious origins and a powerful ability to infect and spread. However, the authors spent most of their time trying to trace the virus to a natural outbreak from bats. This was propaganda. It was the original Chinese line. At that time, the death toll was approaching 200,000. Today, the death toll is over 600,000. The story line has now changed. On May 23 of this year, the Journal reported that three researchers from China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, a bioweapons laboratory of the People’s Liberation Army, became sick enough in November 2019 that they sought hospital care. The source was “a previously undisclosed U.S. intelligence report that could add weight to growing calls for a fuller probe of whether the Covid-19 virus may have escaped from the laboratory.” Although the narrative changed, the idea of taking the Red Chinese off the hook continues, as we were now drawn to the notion that the virus somehow “escaped.” Notice how many times we see the term “escaped” or “leaked” from a lab, as if the virus had a brain of its own. The brain is the Communist Party of China. That brain has outsmarted the U.S. for decades. As if this wasn’t bad enough, I am still hearing from the clueless people who think the virus is a hoax and that Trump’s successful vaccines are a genocidal plot. Ironically, these are some of the same people who tend to believe the “QAnon” theory that Trump is a New Age Messiah. The latest variation of this theory is that Trump will return to the White House in August. As the Chinese communists laugh at us and prepare for nuclear war, there is a major propaganda effort to convince us that the Chinese communist scientists did not deliberately release the virus and they are just incompetent. People can’t be that evil, can they? Perhaps if you hear the terms “lab leak” often enough you will believe it. A variation of this theme is that many labs are “loosely regulated” and that a new global initiative is needed to regulate them. They are simply assuming the next line of defense in terms of excusing Chinese mass murder of millions. First, it was an accidental release from an animal. Now it’s an accidental release from a lab. More than a year into the pandemic and China Joe himself says the Intelligence Community can’t figure out what happened. That’s what $70 billion (the annual Intelligence Community budget) buys you. Another 90 days and another investigation mean nothing. There will be new twists and turns, all designed to obscure the nature of this weapon. The latest is a communist video showing “researchers” from the Wuhan lab handling bats and collecting feces in the field. This is a new variation of the claim that the virus came from animals. Although some have claimed the deaths from this serial killer have been inflated, the opposite is the case. The University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation estimates that the number of people who have died of COVID-19 in the U.S. is more than 900,000. Whether 600,000 or 900,000, these are real people -- real Americans. Not to mention the devastation of the U.S. economy, giving Democrats the excuse they needed to make changes in election law, resulting in the installation of China Joe as president. We are now supposed to conclude the release of the virus was just an accident. That’s what China Joe’s intelligence agencies will probably conclude. Oh well, mistakes were made. The bottom line: Americans died and the Chinese lied. This we know for sure. They concealed the source of the “outbreak” and covered-up. Why would they lie? Just to cover up an accident? Or would the lie be designed to obscure a biological weapons program? The assumption seems to be that the Chinese would not deliberately infect their own people. But these are communists from China. This is a genocidal regime that many believe is already engaging in genocide against the Uyghurs in their own country. Going through the motions of looking tough, the U.S. Senate unanimously passed U.S. Senator Josh Hawley’s (R-Mo.) bill to “require the Biden administration to declassify intelligence related to any potential links between the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and the origins of the Covid pandemic.” The bill was cosponsored by Senator Mike Braun (R-Ind.). The fact that Democrats did not object means that the results will be meaningless. They know China will be let off the hook. We already know about the “potential links” between the lab and U.S. agencies. It’s another waste of time. Senator Hawley also introduced legislation to allow American citizens to sue the Chinese government for damages. China will respond by hiring American lawyers to fight the charges. A court case could go on for years and years, a process designed to make slip-and-fall lawyers rich and postpone the day of reckoning. China won’t pay; we will. And we may already be in the midst of another pandemic. *Cliff Kincaid is president of America’s Survival, Inc. www.usasurvival.org ![]() China’s Massacre of the Innocents By Cliff Kincaid = May 31, 2021 In the war on America waged by Communist China, we were betrayed by those in the federal government whose mission was to prevent our enemies from releasing biological warfare agents. Our frontline troops with superior weapons were not able to stop the onslaught and have in fact been blamed by China in a Soviet-stye disinformation campaign for spreading the disease. But one brave soldier, Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier, has stepped forward to warn of a Chinese-style Marxist cultural revolution in the military, our usual line of defense. He was fired. On America’s Survival TV, J.R. Nyquist and I discussed the demoralization and division in the Armed Forces raised by Lohmeier’s book, Irresistible Revolution: Marxism's Goal of Conquest & the Unmaking of the American Military. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, a former Navy SEAL, says, “Enough is enough. We won’t let our military fall to woke ideology." He is urging other whistleblowers to come forward. “For too long,” he says, “progressive Pentagon staffers have been calling the shots for our warfighters, and spineless military commanders have let it happen. Now we are going to expose you.” Dr. Anthony Fauci has exposed himself. Of all the things Fauci has said, perhaps the most incriminating is that he doesn’t “have enough insight” into the Communist Party in China to understand “the interactions” between the communists and their scientists. Fauci is supposed to be one of the experts devising the U.S. response to the China virus but he is implicated in its origin. Fauci’s resignation alone won’t solve anything. It’s the mind-set that’s the problem. In his exchange with Senator John Kennedy, when asked about grants to the Wuhan lab, Fauci said: “Well, we generally always trust the grantee to do what they say, and you look at the results…” He added, “I cannot guarantee that a grantee has not lied to us because you never know.” Fauci must not have read the book by Dr. Fred Schwarz, You Can Trust the Communists (to be Communists). In his other famous book, Why Communism Kills: The Legacy of Karl Marx, Dr. Schwarz argued that “The liquidation of the bourgeoisie is an essential step of the path to Communism. This is why Communism must kill.” Fauci didn’t read the Constitution of the Communist Party of China, which declares, “The Communist Party of China is the vanguard both of the Chinese working class and of the Chinese people and the Chinese nation. It is the core of leadership for the cause of socialism with Chinese characteristics and represents the development trend of China’s advanced productive forces, the orientation of China’s advanced culture and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people. The realization of communism is the highest ideal and ultimate goal of the Party.” Bertil Haggman, director of the Center for Research on Geopolitics in Sweden, notes that the Communist Party of China (CCP) is a criminal political party that is probably responsible for killing between 80 and 100 million people, the highest number of political killings in modern time by one party-state perpetrator. Of course, we will have to add to that total the millions of people dead from the China virus. While Fauci claims not to understand the nature of the Chinese communist dictatorship, he could learn a little by reading about current events. A Reuters story reported on the celebration of the 100th founding anniversary of the Communist Party of China and noted that party members “raised their fists and chanted the party oath in unison.” The story added that they cried out “I will never betray the party,” as they faced statues of the People's Republic of China “founder” Mao Zedong and other revolutionary leaders. In fact, Mao was not the CCP founder. Haggman notes that the Communist Party of China was actually founded by a Bolshevik Soviet agent, Grigori Naumovich Voitinsky, a Russian born in Belarus in 1893. He was an agent of the Communist International (Comintern). Hagmann tells me, “Voitinsky, the real founder of CCP, grew up in the U.S., joined the American Socialist Party, was active in the USA and Canada. He went to Soviet Russia after the Bolshevik coup d’état and was in China as a Comintern agent. Little seems to be known about his time as a socialist in the West.” What we need, argues Haggman, is a strategy of “decoupling” from China and freezing the regime out of the world economic system. He writes, “Americans, and all Westerners, now have to ask if there should be collaboration with a regime that ultimately seeks to be a totalitarian world hegemon. Is it possible to have a relationship with a regime who believes in engaging in unrestricted warfare to achieve it?” A good first step would be stop the process of the U.S, joining the world communist movement by prohibiting our own government from flying Marxist Black Lives Matter flags at our embassies around the world. The Marxist leader of the group just resigned after questions were raised about her using donations to buy four homes and live a lavish lifestyle. As demonstrated by Jim Simpson’s new book, Who Was Karl Marx?, Marx and the Marxists who followed him were mostly losers and degenerates who nevertheless understood how to stir up hatred. The book, The Private Life of Chairman Mao, written by his physician, documents the communist dictator’s addiction to sleeping pills and barbiturates. The book exposes Mao as a degenerate and philanderer with homosexual tendencies and genital herpes who engaged in orgies. A man “devoid of human feeling, incapable of love,” he nevertheless was a dedicated communist with an understanding of Marxist dialectics and knew how to “unleash the energies of the people” through socialism. Today, Communist China has more billionaires than the United States. Mass murder pays. *Cliff Kincaid is president of America’s Survival, Inc. www.usasurvival.org Hate is the Essence of Socialism
By Cliff Kincaid On March 15, 2016 When will socialist Democrat Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) be held accountable by the media for his own revolutionary and hateful rhetoric? “Not Donald Trump, not anyone else will be successful in dividing us based on race or our country of origin,” says Sanders. Meredith Warren, a Republican political analyst and consultant, counters [1]: “But Sanders should take a long look in the mirror. Both he and many of his Democratic cohort, including Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, are fiercely pushing a campaign message specifically intended to divide America along different lines—economic ones.” Warren, a graduate of Boston University’s College of Communication, where she majored in broadcast journalism, should be congratulated for drawing attention to the media’s double standard. On one occasion, during an appearance on Iowa public television, Sanders was asked about promoting class warfare. He turned the question around [2] and insisted that class warfare was being waged by the rich against the middle class and the poor. The problem for Sanders is that his political philosophy is ultimately based on the notion of the elimination of the bourgeoisie—the middle-class owners of property—as set forth in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. “This person must indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible,” it says. This is the theory of class warfare. In his book, Why Communism Kills: The Legacy of Karl Marx [3], Dr. Fred Schwarz argued that “The liquidation of the bourgeoisie is an essential step of the path to Communism. This is why Communism must kill.” In his famous “Time for Choosing” speech [4] in 1964, Ronald Reagan captured the essence and attraction of Marxism, saying, “We have so many people who can’t see a fat man standing beside a thin one without coming to the conclusion the fat man got that way by taking advantage of the thin one.” American economist Henry Hazlitt said it a different way: “The whole gospel of Karl Marx can be summed up in a single sentence: Hate the man who is better off than you are. Never under any circumstances admit that his success may be due to his own efforts, to the productive contribution he has made to the whole community. Always attribute his success to the exploitation, the cheating, the more or less open robbery of others.” That is the essence of the Sanders campaign strategy. In his book, Socialism in America [5], John L. Bowman writes about envy being one of the driving forces behind socialism: “…the simple desire to want what another has.” He added, “After all the moralizing about justice, freedom from oppression, disparity of wealth, and obligation to help others according to their needs, the truth may be that socialists are just plain envious of those with money.” Bowman says one reason for socialist envy is that “socialists often lack the ability to make money.” A good example was Marx, the father of communism, who is usually described in glowing terms as a philosopher, journalist, historian, and economist. But “he never earned a living wage and was largely supported by Engels,” notes the entry [6] at biography.com. Paul Johnson’s book Intellectuals, notes Bowman, said that Marx was “unwilling to work at a job, borrowed money to live, and was incompetent with personal finances, all of which led to lifelong money problems and his subsequent hatred of money, money lenders, usury, and capitalists.” Bowman adds, “During the last part of his life, Marx and his family lived in a two-room apartment on Dean Street, near Soho in London in dire poverty.” Sanders has escaped such a fate because he has been a career politician. We’ve noted that James O’Brien, a political consultant and former publisher of Campaigns & Elections magazine, calculates [7] that Sanders, who has been a mayor, member of Congress and a U.S. senator, has achieved the financial status of a millionaire. He concludes that Sanders and his wife have a net worth in the range of $1.2 to $1.5 million, not the $700,000 or less that is usually reported by the media. Sanders apparently once performed manual labor on an Israeli commune or kibbutz dedicated to Joseph Stalin. The Times of Israel reported [8], “Leaving the cabin he shared with a few other American college student volunteers, Sanders would have a quick bite of bread before heading out to the orchard. After 2 1/2 hours of work, he and the other 20 or so volunteers would sit down for a traditional 30-minute Israeli breakfast of tomatoes, cucumbers, onions, butter and hard-boiled eggs…The kibbutz belonged to the Israeli political party Mapam, which in the 1950s had been a communist, Soviet-affiliated faction. Kibbutz members had admired Joseph Stalin until his death, and they would celebrate May Day with red flags. They spoke of controlling the means of production, taking from each according to his abilities and giving to each according to his needs.” Is this where and how Sanders first became a socialist? Sanders won’t talk about it. The media have asked for details, but he and his campaign won’t respond. AP reports [9], “Sanders won’t identify the Israeli kibbutz where he briefly volunteered in the 1960s. When reporters found the kibbutz, Sha’ar Ha’amakim in northern Israel, he wouldn’t comment.” The conclusion is inescapable: Sanders is a hard-core Marxist who preaches class warfare. He calls himself a democratic socialist, but he wants to avoid any mention of communism. Donald J. Trump has called him a communist, a charge Sanders denies. “He calls me a communist. That’s a lie,” Sanders thunders. Yet, as we noted in our coverage [10] of one of the Democratic debates, Sanders did not disavow his previous comments in support of the communist dictatorship in Cuba. Hatred is “the heart of Marxism,” Henry Hazlett said [11]. “This is its animating force. You can throw away the dialectical materialism, the Hegelian framework, the technical jargon, the ‘scientific’ analysis, and millions of pretentious words, and you still have the core: the implacable hatred and envy that are the raison d’être for all the rest.” Meantime, Communist China has more billionaires than the United States, according to the Hurun Global Rich List 2016 [12]. It finds that there are 568 Chinese billionaires, compared to 535 in the U.S. Beijing has replaced New York as the billionaire capital of the world. Still, the Constitution of the Communist Party of China declares [13], “The Communist Party of China is the vanguard both of the Chinese working class and of the Chinese people and the Chinese nation. It is the core of leadership for the cause of socialism with Chinese characteristics and represents the development trend of China’s advanced productive forces, the orientation of China’s advanced culture and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people. The realization of communism is the highest ideal and ultimate goal of the Party.” Of course, as we’ve argued, the communists use capitalism to create the wealth they couldn’t create through socialism. Such a development is why many conservatives still love the old song by The Who, “Won’t Get Fooled Again,” with the lyrics: “Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.” Except that the new communist boss is actually worse than the old boss. Article printed from Accuracy in Media: https://www.aim.org URL to article: https://www.aim.org/aim-column/hate-is-the-essence-of-socialism/ URLs in this post: [1] counters: https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2015/09/10/the-democrats-stoke-class-warfare/fZodtsCeeZ5wMxHlBknDKJ/story.html [2] turned the question around: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOTGaxFlfr8 [3] Why Communism Kills: The Legacy of Karl Marx: http://www.amazon.com/Why-communism-kills-legacy-Karl/dp/B000717RPS [4] speech: https://reaganlibrary.archives.gov/archives/reference/timechoosing.html [5] Socialism in America: http://www.amazon.com/Socialism-America-John-L-Bowman/dp/0595340563 [6] entry: http://www.biography.com/people/karl-marx-9401219 [7] calculates: http://www.democracy.love/socialist_bernie_sanders_is_a_millionaire_the_politics_of_financial_disclosure [8] reported: http://www.timesofisrael.com/50-years-on-bernie-sanders-still-champions-values-of-his-israeli-kibbutz/ [9] reports: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/73a5b11328fb4e67ba13f6b3fdca27e6/sanders-keeps-his-judaism-background-irking-us-jews [10] our coverage: http://www.aim.org/aim-column/sanders-exposes-himself-on-national-tv/ [11] Henry Hazlett said: http://fee.org/articles/the-cure-of-poverty/ [12] Hurun Global Rich List 2016: http://www.hurun.net/en/ArticleShow.aspx?nid=15703 [13] declares: http://english.cpc.people.com.cn/206972/206981/8188065.html Fauci-Kenney exchanges about whether U.S. grant money could have funded creation of killer viruses in Wuhan:
Senator John Kennedy: “Dr. Fauci, I believe you have testified that you didn’t give any money to the Wuhan lab to conduct gain-of-function research. Is that right?” Fauci: “That is correct.” . . . Kennedy: “How do you know they didn’t lie to you and use the money for gain-of-function research anyway?” Fauci: “Well, we’ve seen the results of the experiments that were done and that were published—and that the viruses that they studied are on public data bases now. So, none of that was gain-of-function, so—" Kennedy: “How do you know that they didn’t do the research and not put it on their website? Fauci: “There’s no way of guaranteeing that, but in our experience with grantees, including Chinese grantees, which we have had interactions with for a very long period of time, they are very competent, trustworthy scientists.” . . . Kennedy: “You think all the scientists have told the truth in terms of the origin of the Wuhan virus and not been influenced by the Communist Party of China, do you?” Fauci: “I don’t have enough insight into the Communist Party in China to know the interactions between them and the scientists, sir.” . . . Kennedy: “Here’s where I’m getting at: You gave them money, and you said, ‘Don’t do gain-of-function research.’” Fauci: “Correct.” Kennedy: “And they said, ‘We won’t.’” Fauci: “Correct.” Kennedy: “And you have no way of knowing whether they did or not, except you trust them. Is that right?” Fauci: “Well, we generally always trust the grantee to do what they say, and you look at the results—” Kennedy: “Have you ever had a grantee lie to you?” Fauci: “I cannot guarantee that a grantee has not lied to us because you never know.” Kennedy: “Can we agree that if you took President Xi Jinping and turned him upside down and shook him, the World Health Organization would fall out of his pocket?” Fauci: “I don’t think I can answer that question, sir. I’m sorry.” |