![]() Catching the Killers and Criminals By Cliff Kincaid A new Netflix series, “Catching Killers,” looks at the murderers caught by law enforcement, using police work, fingerprinting and DNA testing. A program like this should focus on the villains in the mass murder of more than one million Americans and nearly 7 million people worldwide who have died from COVID-19. It would be an easy case to solve. Bringing justice to the world is a more difficult proposition. I was flipping through the channels on Monday and noticed that investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger was on Fox, calmly documenting that the Biden Administration had violated the law by refusing to reveal the details surrounding U.S. funding of the COVID research in China that produced the pandemic. It looks like the Intelligence Community, in a case more serious than the Hunter Biden scandal, is above the law. To be sure. the Hunter Biden case involves impeachable offenses on the part of the “Big Guy,” implicated in alleged bribery schemes. But COVID was mass murder. A cover-up of the U.S. role in that suffering and death is worse than Joe and Hunter taking millions from foreign governments. Taken together, Russia-gate and the COVID pandemic and cover-up prove that the U.S. Government is working with our enemies against the American people. COVID, in my view, is a modern-day version of the anthrax letters case. Our research showed the anthrax was stolen from a U.S. lab by an al-Qaeda operative. It was the second wave of 9/11, the first being the terrorist attacks on New York City and the Pentagon. Remember that the anthrax was in envelopes carrying the phrases “Death to Israel” and “Death to America.” Overwhelming circumstantial evidence pointed to al Qaeda operatives sending the anthrax. Still, then-FBI Director Robert Mueller blamed American scientists for terrorism carried out by al Qaeda. Later, he was rewarded for this cover-up by running the Russia-gate operation against Trump. That wasted over two years of the Trump presidency. So now, with the COVID pandemic and cover-up, we see the post-9/11 anthrax letters case happening on a global level. In both cases, our enemies have released biological weapons made possible by U.S. Government funding and research. On Fox, Michael Shellenberger called for a bipartisan commission, like the panel that investigated 9/11, to examine the origins of COVID. But we already know enough to implicate the U.S. Government in the COVID deaths, which served as an excuse for a massive expansion of government control and seemed designed to derail Trump’s “Make America Great” agenda and elect China Joe. This was a Chinese operation. But instead of sending members of the federal bureaucracy to jail, where they should be, the Department of Justice has raided former President Trump’s home and arrested him for supposedly mishandling documents that were legally his under the Presidential Records Act. Anybody with common sense understands what is happening. Biden and members of his administration are operating as agents of China. They fear Trump’s return to the presidency. In a recent development involving Russia, the Biden State Department has announced that it is targeting the Kremlin’s “global malign influence operations and election interference activities” by sanctioning several KGB (FSB) officers. This is truly disinformation. These are the same people behind the Russia-gate hoax, paid for by Hillary and the Democrats, with advance knowledge of then-President Obama and his then-vice-president Joe Biden. In fact, as the Durham report shows, Russia-gate was a Russian operation linked to the KGB to destroy President Donald Trump and put Biden in office. So those who worked with Russia to destroy Trump are now going through the motions of posturing as enemies of the Putin regime. In a world where truth mattered, Biden and former President Obama would be sanctioned, even jailed, for spreading the Russia-gate hoax. But they run the government. The criminals are running our country in cahoots with the killers who unleashed the virus through the Wuhan lab. Here at home, as we see pro-Trump protesters going to prison because of trespassing offenses on January 6, we see in the raid on the Montana gun shop by armed IRS and ATF agents that the next phase of the communist program is to seize the arms that ordinary people have assembled, under the Second Amendment, to defend themselves. “I’m incredibly disturbed by initial reports that the IRS and ATF closed Highwood Creek Outfitters without any warning today,” said Rep. Matt Rosendale. “This is yet another example of the Biden Administration weaponizing federal agencies to target and harass hardworking Americans.” In effect, the U.S. Government has become the enemy, a carbon copy in making of what the Russian and Chinese people have suffered under for decades. They will either kill us through biological warfare experiments or take our guns and leave us defenseless. Either way, we end up dead or in prison. Then they cover-up their wrongdoing, all for the purpose of fulfilling Barack Hussein Obama’s promise to fundamentally transform America. In terms of Congressional action, time is running out. In my view, as the author of three books on our first Marxist president, the investigations and hearings must focus on Obama, the mastermind, not Biden or Attorney General Garland. Remember Biden was Obama’s vice-president and Garland was his nominee for the Supreme Court. He was Obama’s fixer. Another subpoena should go to George Soros, the hedge fund operator who made Obama’s Permanent Revolution possible. As we saw in the raids on pro-lifers and the “gay pride” push by the federal government, we can anticipate that federal agents will be knocking at your door, or possibly breaking down the door, demanding copies of the Bible, and grilling you on such matters as to whether you take seriously Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13. If you believe God created male and female and if you believe homosexuality is a sin, watch out. Meanwhile, the U.S. Embassy in the Vatican is flying the “gay pride” flag, and the Vatican itself is going gay, issuing a document welcoming “LGBTQ+ persons” into the Roman Catholic Church. “Who am I to judge” is the famous statement of Pope Francis. The same pope had accepted a communist crucifix from Evo Morales of Bolivia. With this glaring lack of judgment on moral issues, it is up to the people, including parishioners in the church, to demand justice. We can refuse to subsidize the churches. But the federal government’s abuses of power require a different response. In order to get mentally prepared for what is to come, we have to understand that America is literally being occupied by the enemy, a fact we must maintain in the forefront of our mind. *A personal note from Cliff Kincaid. My America’s Survival anti-communist videos were totally banned by YouTube and we are now trying to get them on a new platform. Go to our “Give” section on our home page www.usasurvival.org This is a secure way of making donations.
0 Comments
![]() Living Under Communism By Cliff Kincaid Whatever the probability of a recession, it is inevitable that, sooner or later, under its current rulers, the U.S. economy will go bankrupt, leading to a reorganization under the “global leadership” of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. Such a development will result in an international socialist state, including a global minimum tax on U.S. corporations (and consumers) and then a global tax on individual Americans and their stocks, mutual funds, and pensions. My 1997 book, Global Taxes for World Government, explains how it will come about. In this context, as bankruptcy approaches, the IMF has published a report arguing that the founder of the IMF was not a Soviet espionage agent in the U.S. Government. This is an important topic since there are major implications if we discover that the “international order” supposedly developed by the United States at the end of World War II was really designed to serve the interests of world communism. White had served as Director of the Division of Monetary Research at the Secretary of the Treasury. Former Communists Whittaker Chambers and Elizabeth Bentley accused White of having been a Soviet agent while in government. The Venona communications, which exposed a massive Soviet espionage effort against the U.S., unmasked such traitors as State Department official (and U.N. founder) Alger Hiss, Department of Justice official Judith Coplon, and Harry Dexter White. However, the IMF describes him this way: Harry Dexter White profoundly influenced both the design of the IMF and its development, yet his important work is not widely appreciated today. The fiftieth anniversary of his death offers an opportunity to review his accomplishments and career.” James Boughton, a former IMF historian who wrote the report on White, “The Case Against Harry Dexter White: Still Not Proven,” acknowledges, “Without question, Harry Dexter White was one of the two great intellectual founders of the IMF and the World Bank.” Boughton went further, writing an entire book defending the Soviet agent against charges he was a Soviet agent. It was titled, Harry White and the American Creed How a Federal Bureaucrat Created the Modern Global Economy (and Failed to Get the Credit). “In this book,” says the publisher, Yale University Press, “James Boughton rehabilitates White, delving into his life and work and returning him to a central role as the architect of the world’s financial system.” Allan Ryskind, a columnist and former editor and owner of Human Events, says Boughton has viciously and dishonestly lied about former communists Elizabeth Bentley and Whittaker Chambers, who revealed the existence of the communist espionage network that included White as well as U.N. founder Alger Hiss. In an article for Newsmax, Ryskind says Boughton's book “is packed with astonishing ignorance, disproved allegations and untruths that are easily exposed. The result is that Boughton cannot be believed about anything he writes…” So why is there an effort to rehabilitate White and his IMF? As I have noted in my books on the United Nations, the IMF has always been viewed as the beginning of a new global regulatory body that could eventually impose and collect a currency transactions tax known as the Tobin Tax, named after the late Yale University economist, James Tobin. Steven Solomon, a former staff reporter at Forbes, says in his book, The Confidence Game, that such a proposal “might net some $13 trillion a year…” because it is based on taking a percentage of money from the trillions of dollars exchanged daily in global financial markets. Such transactions are commonplace on behalf of Americans who have stock in mutual funds or companies that invest or operate overseas Americans might be surprised to learn that the IMF already supervises the U.S. economy and issues a “country report” on the U.S. economic system. “A core responsibility of the IMF is monitoring the economic and financial policies of member countries and providing them with policy advice,” the global agency openly says. It is now happening with an anti-American and pro-China bent. Interestingly, IMF boss Kristina Georgieva was accused of pressuring staff to manipulate the 2018 “Doing Business Report” to favor China while she was the Chief Executive Officer of the World Bank. Rep. French Hill, (R-AR), Vice-Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, urged her termination and said China was indeed playing a key role: “Despite its lack of commitment to playing by the rules, the Chinese Communist Party feels entitled to greater influence in our multilateral institutions like the IMF, World Health Organization, and United Nations, and certainly doesn’t need the assistance of anyone to tilt the playing field in their favor.” “At the time” of the scandal, said a release from the office of Rep. Andy Barr (R-GA), “Georgieva was allegedly attempting to convince the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to increase financial support to the World Bank.” “Georgieva has built a reputation at the World Bank as a champion of gender equality and leader in the global fight against climate change,” said a Reuters dispatch. In other words, she serves the interests of the “woke” American corporate and global elite working in cahoots with the global agencies and the communists and socialists who run them. Meanwhile, the United Nations General Assembly is planning a summit in September 22-23, 2024, to unveil an “action-oriented” Pact for the Future that will include changes to the “global tax architecture.” A global tax is in America’s future because the United Nations, the IMF and the World Bank are, in effect, functioning as communist front organizations. *Cliff Kincaid is president of America’s Survival, Inc. www.usasurvival.org ![]() Obama's horrendous Father's Day example By Cliff Kincaid June 20, 2015 When Barack Obama campaigned for president in 2008, few Americans would have guessed that his administration would become the most anti-family force in U.S. history by celebrating gay marriage and the spectacle of men becoming women through the phenomenon of "transgenderism." Obama had portrayed himself as a committed pro-family Christian who recognized the importance of male role models and fathers in the family structure. "Of all the rocks upon which we build our lives, we are reminded today that family is the most important. And we are called to recognize and honor how critical every father is to that foundation," Obama said in a "Fatherhood speech" in June of that year. But in response to Bruce Jenner, a biological father of six, declaring he was actually female, Obama said, "It takes courage to share your story." Nothing was said about the impact such a bizarre declaration would have on one's children, or the condition of one's mental state to bring that about. Obama seemed to be endorsing genital mutilation as a way out of mental confusion or mental illness. Obama's definition of family has certainly changed. Indeed, he was once in favor of marriage being between one man and one woman, and today he celebrates fatherless and motherless families. He lied about his commitment to traditional marriage in order to get elected. It was a big con, but only one of many deceptions from the candidate of "hope and change" whose lasting legacy, as noted in Professor Paul Kengor's new book Takedown, could very well be cultural and not economic transformation. After all, parts of Obamacare could be repealed over time, and economic reforms could arrest our debt problem, which has accelerated under Obama. But restoring the traditional family is a mammoth undertaking that even Republican presidential candidates are generally afraid to talk about. Speaking to the Apostolic Church of God in Chicago in that 2008 speech, Obama had quoted from the Bible and said to the congregation, "if we are honest with ourselves" they would have to admit that "too many fathers...[are] missing from too many lives and too many homes. They have abandoned their responsibilities, acting like boys instead of men. And the foundations of our families are weaker because of it." But the fact that "Bruce" Jenner will go missing from that family is something that is now celebrated by Obama. If Obama had told that black congregation that he would be a president who would go down in history as praising a man for dressing up like a woman, the audience would have probably laughed out loud, thinking it was a joke. Who could have anticipated that a man who once lectured the nation on the need for a strong father would later defend a father's decision to quit being one. Another major deception from Obama was his claim that he never really had a father who was part of his life. In a 2013 Morehouse College address, he said, "I was raised by a heroic single mom, wonderful grandparents – made incredible sacrifices for me. And I know there are moms and grandparents here today who did the same thing for all of you. But I sure wish I had had a father who was not only present, but involved. Didn't know my dad. And so my whole life, I've tried to be for Michelle and my girls what my father was not for my mother and me. I want to break that cycle where a father is not at home – (applause) – where a father is not helping to raise that son or daughter. I want to be a better father, a better husband, a better man." Filmmaker Joel Gilbert says that Obama's comments about not having a father present in his childhood are 100 percent bogus, and that he had several fathers or father-figures. Gilbert, director of the film "Dreams from My Real Father," examines Obama's formative years and comes to the determination that the Communist Party member and suspected Soviet espionage agent, Frank Marshall Davis, was Obama's real biological father. He believes the Kenyan Obama was a "father in name only" who was used to cover up an affair between Davis and Obama's mother. Gilbert added, "Obama's problem was not a lack of fathers, rather it was that his biological father became his ideological mentor and radicalized him into an anti-American ideology." We broke the story in the U.S. that Davis was Obama's childhood mentor, a fact that The Washington Post still will not admit. Obama himself admits Davis "schooled" him on white racism. "All my research has indicated that Obama visited with Davis about three times per week during his entire youth from age 10 to 18," Gilbert says. "Davis gave him money, taught him to drink whiskey, took him to strip clubs, and indoctrinated Obama during those formative years with his Communist view of the world." In addition to Davis, however, Gilbert says Obama had other "fathers" or father figures. These included his grandfather, "gramps," a constant father figure presence, and his adopted father, Lolo Soetoro, whom he stayed in touch with even after his mother divorced him. He adds, "Never one to be without a father figure, Obama enlisted a [Frank Marshall Davis] carbon copy ideologue, whom he said 'was like an uncle.'" That was the notorious Reverend Jeremiah Wright, who functioned like a father to Obama after Frank Marshall Davis died. Like Davis, Wright was a vicious anti-American. The idea that Davis is truly Obama's "real father" is certainly controversial and could only be solved definitively by DNA analysis. However, Gilbert recently interviewed Obama's half-brother, Malik Obama, who says that "Frank Marshall Davis and Barack look alike," and that Barack does not look like his father, the Kenyan Obama. Comparison photos between Frank Marshall Davis and President Obama are indeed striking. Malik Obama says he would welcome a DNA test, and that this might explain why Barack dumped the Kenyan Obamas after he was elected President. Once a strong proponent of the traditional meaning of Father's Day, in order to get elected to the presidency, Obama will now go down in history for demeaning this national celebration honoring fathers and fatherhood. Consider Barack Obama as the President who celebrated a man for acting and trying to look like a woman. At this rate, Father's Day cards will one day be sold in the "he" and "she" categories. The impact on our young people from this presidential "example" will be seen and felt in the years ahead: more sexual confusion, alienation from family, mental illness, and suicides. This is what progressive "change" looks like. Exhibits You Won’t Find in the National Museum of African American History and Culture
Parts 1 and 2 By Cliff Kincaid / Published in 2016 Many exhibits in the new $500 million National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C. will be worthwhile. They will highlight the struggle to overcome slavery and give black people the rights they were promised in the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution. Many black Americans have achieved great success. But black leadership in America, which is viewed by the media as almost exclusively liberal and Democratic, is not without major flaws. In addition, we think that the growing black conservative movement will not be given the attention it deserves. In the spirit of truth and transparency, we offer examples of exhibits that we have reason to believe, based on advance publicity, will not be available to those visiting the museum: · The Democratic Party’s history of slavery. The Republican Party was born in 1854 in opposition to slavery, and the Democratic Party was the party of slavery. As documented in Dinesh D’Souza’s new movie, “Hillary’s America,” the Democratic Party is historically racist. Democratic President Woodrow Wilson attended a screening of the pro-KKK film, “The Birth of a Nation,” in the White House itself. Wilson was so racist that liberal Princeton students have demanded removal of his name from campus buildings. Hillary Clinton once called former Ku Klux Klan member Senator Robert K. Byrd (D-WV) her “mentor,” saying after his death, “Today our country has lost a true American original, my friend and mentor Robert C. Byrd.” As noted by The Daily Caller, Byrd joined the Klan because he was worried that during World War II, he might have to fight alongside “race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.” Yet, no Republican presidential candidate has gotten more than 15 percent of the black vote since 1965. · Black Lives Matter is a racist organization that praises cop-killer Assata Shakur. A Black Lives Matter T-shirt is on display in the museum, in order to highlight “contemporary” black issues. The Back Lives Matter Exposed project of Accuracy in Media looks at the violent nature of the organization, including its support for Assata Shakur, a member of the Black Liberation Army (BLA), a group that worked with the communist terrorist Weather Underground. Shakur, also known as Joanne Chesimard, killed New Jersey State Trooper Werner Foerster “execution style” by shooting him in the head as he lay wounded by gunfire. Obama has highlighted the killings of black people in a campaign carried forward by his own Department of Justice against local police forces. Yet, Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute notes that, as of July 9 of this year, whites made up 54 percent of the 440 police shooting victims, compared to 28 percent who were black. In 2015, whites made up 50 percent of the 987 fatal police shootings, while blacks made up 26 percent. · The Communist mentor of the first black President. Barack Obama’s election as the first black president was facilitated by liberal media bias, since his father-son relationship with black Communist pornographer and pedophile Frank Marshall Davis was deliberately ignored by the liberal press. Liberals in the media knew that his association with a prominent communist would sink his campaign. In 2008, during his first run for office, the relationship was ignored by influential reporters like David Maraniss of The Washington Post, whose own parents were Communist Party members. Even the Drudge Report would not sell advertising to tell the story of Frank Marshall Davis. In 2012, newspapers like The New York Times and USA Today and conservative media like Newsmax refused advertising for the film, “Dreams from My Real Father,” which cited evidence that Davis was actually Obama’s real father. Obama admitted that Davis, a writer for communist publications, had instructed him that black people have “reason to hate.” · Martin Luther King Jr.’s womanizing, plagiarism, and communist advisers. While Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a fighter for civil rights and showed unique courage in opposing racism, he has his own serious flaws. The evidence shows that both President John F. Kennedy and his brother Bobby obtained and passed on information about King’s extramarital affairs and womanizing. It was information that had been obtained from FBI wiretaps on King authorized by Bobby himself. The Kennedy brothers, both anti-communist Democrats, were alarmed by King’s communist associations. One of King’s closest advisers was J.H. O’Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O’Dell. He was a secret member of the Communist Party who would later join Jesse Jackson’s Operation PUSH. Another King adviser was New York attorney Stanley Levison, who had been involved in Communist Party financial affairs and was helping to arrange funding of the party by Moscow. He had recommended O’Dell to King. Despite his reputation as a moderate, Martin Luther King, Jr. paid tribute to W.E.B. Du Bois, who had joined the CPUSA himself in 1961, at an event sponsored by the Soviet-funded journal Freedomways in New York City. King’s opposition to American involvement in the war against communism in Vietnam was strongly influenced by his communist associations. The facts also show that the famed civil rights leader was a plagiarist who stole material from other people and claimed it as his own. · Unpatriotic black sports figures. The sports exhibit at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture highlights the positive impact of black athletes such as Jackie Robinson on American society. But unpatriotic displays have been more common recently. “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color,” NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick said. Kaepernick also has worn socks depicting police as pigs. President Obama commented, “I think he cares about some real, legitimate issues that have to be talked about. If nothing else, he’s generated more conversation about issues that have to be talked about.” Kaepernick, the child of a black man, was raised by white parents and is making an $11.9 million base salary this year. Black athletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos gave a Black Power raised fist salute, common among communists and socialists, during the 1968 Summer Olympics. Black Muslim boxer Cassius Clay, also known as Muhammad Ali, refused Army induction in 1967, saying, “Why should they ask me to put on a uniform and go 10,000 miles from home and drop bombs and bullets on brown people in Vietnam while so-called Negro people in Louisville are treated like dogs and denied simple human rights?” Protests against the Vietnam War, which were backed by the Soviet bloc and organized by domestic communist groups, forced a U.S. military withdrawal from Vietnam, leading to a communist takeover that produced hundreds of thousands of political prisoners and Vietnamese “boat people” trying to escape. Almost two million people were then murdered in a campaign of genocide in neighboring Cambodia, carried out by the communist Khmer Rouge. More than 58,000 Americans died trying to stop a communist takeover of Southeast Asia. · Paul Robeson: a black dupe of reds. A Soviet campaign was launched after the Russian revolution to exploit the “Negro question” in the U.S. and manipulate blacks and members of other minority groups for Communist purposes. The goal was a “Soviet America.” Although he invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked by a congressional committee about his party membership, the CPUSA admitted, after his death, that actor and singer Paul Robeson had been a party member. Former CPUSA official Manning Johnson had testified in 1949 that that he saw Robeson “a number of times in the headquarters” of the CPUSA and that Robeson was, in fact, a party member. Johnson said Robeson wanted to be “the Black Stalin among Negroes.” Johnson testified, “Paul’s assignment was to work among the intellectuals, the professionals, and artists that the party was seeking to penetrate and influence along Communist lines.” · Why Richard Wright broke with the Communist Party. Richard Wright, author of the classic texts Black Boy and Native Son, was a prominent black American author who joined the Communist Party but then became disillusioned by the party’s corruption and authoritarianism, and left it in 1942. He wrote an essay published in Atlantic Monthly in 1944 called “I Tried to Be a Communist,” which was later reprinted (with Wright’s permission) in the book, The God That Failed, a collection of anti-communist essays by ex-Communists. · The NAACP once opposed communism. For many years, black groups such as the NAACP were bitter foes of the Communist Party USA, knowing that its politics were divisive and not designed to foster racial harmony. NAACP official Herbert Hill wrote a famous article, “The Communist Party—Enemy of Negro Equality.” Hill said American blacks desired “integration and assimilation into all aspects of American life on the basis of complete equality,” but that the communists promoted separatism and what he called “super-jim-crowism.” Hill referred to “Communist carpet-baggers” who used nice-sounding front groups to dupe blacks, and called the Communist Party one of the “implacable enemies” of black equality. · The Black Conservative Movement. Leading black conservatives include Jason Riley, author of Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder For Blacks To Succeed; Thomas Sowell of the Hoover Institution; former GOP presidential candidate Ben Carson; Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas; D.C. Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown; South Carolina Republican Senator Tim Scott; and businessman Herman Cain. National Museum of African American History and Culture’s top donors (as reported by The Washington Post): · Oprah Winfrey Charitable Foundation, $21 million · Lilly Endowment, $20 million · Robert Frederick Smith, $20 million · Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, $12 million · The Atlantic Philanthropies, $12 million · Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, $10 million · Rhimes Family Foundation, $10 million · David M. Rubenstein, $10 million · Ford Foundation, $8.6 million · Target, $7.05 million · Kaiser Permanente, $7 million · Robert L. Johnson, $6 million · General Electric, $5.5 million · 3M, $5 million · American Express, $5 million · Boeing, $5 million · Rockefeller Foundation, $5 million · UnitedHealth Group, $5 million · Walmart, $5 million Part Two In Part 1 of this two-part report, I pointed out that “Many exhibits in the new $500 million National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C. will be worthwhile. They will highlight the struggle to overcome slavery and give black people the rights they were promised in the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution. Many black Americans have achieved great success.” I also pointed out that “black leadership in America, which is viewed by the media as almost exclusively liberal and Democratic, is not without major flaws. In addition, we think that the growing black conservative movement will not be given the attention it deserves. In the spirit of truth and transparency, we offer examples of exhibits that we have reason to believe, based on advance publicity, will not be available to those visiting the museum.” In Part 1, I identified nine such exhibits that won’t be available to museum-goers, plus a list of the top donors to the museum. Here are 10 more such exhibits: · Bill Cosby’s history as a sexual predator. During an interview with NBC Nightly News anchorman Lester Holt, museum director Lonnie Bunch said that a guiding principle of the new museum is to “tell the unvarnished truth” about the black experience in America. For example, a statue of founding father Thomas Jefferson is shown in front of 600 bricks, each one named for a slave he owned. However, an exhibit about black entertainer Bill Cosby has only one sentence about his sexual scandals, saying that the “revelations about his alleged sexual misconduct have cast a shadow over Cosby’s entertainment career and severely damaged his reputation.” Lawyers for Cosby are now claiming that racial bias is to blame because 12 of the 13 women who are scheduled to testify in court that he drugged and molested them are white. In total, more than 50 women have accused him of rape, sexual assault, molestation or sexual harassment. · The anti-police cry of “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” was a lie. The false claim that blacks in Ferguson, Missouri responded to a police stop there with “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” fueled the riots that cost businesses and taxpayers millions of dollars, and ruined the career of Police Officer Darren Wilson. The evidence and witness statements in the case demonstrated that no such statement was made, and that a black thug assaulted Officer Wilson and was shot and killed. Yet the museum features the “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” image. Colin Flaherty, an award winning reporter and author of Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry: The hoax of black victimization and those who enable it, says that what happened in Ferguson was a carefully orchestrated hoax, perpetrated with the help of the media. · Black-on-black crime: the Chicago experience. By September 8, 2016, the number of homicides in Chicago this year had already reached 500. This is a 20-year high. In addition, 2,949 people had been shot, according to the Chicago Tribune. A 71-year-old man who was watering his lawn was recently shot by a young black thug who wanted his money. Columnist John Kass reports, “The shooters, these feral young men, aren’t an accident. They are the direct product of the Democratic welfare state that helped destroy families. The government became the father, the fathers became irrelevant or were driven off, and black families that had withstood decades of Jim Crow segregation began to collapse.” · White people were also slaves. Janet Levy, an activist and freelance journalist, notes that while institutional slavery conjures images of pre-Civil War Southern ownership of African slaves, it is actually “an ancient practice dating from ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome, as well as early Amer-Indian empires in Mexico and Central America. It was also well established and ideologically sanctioned in the Muslim world from the days of Mohammed.” Reviewing the contents of the book, Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters, by Ohio State history professor Robert Davis, she adds, “Concurrently with African enslavement in the Americas, a flourishing slave trade existed from 1500 to 1800 of white Christian Europeans by the Muslims of North Africa’s Barbary Coast.” · Slaves helped burn down and build the White House. “I wake up every morning in a house that was built by slaves,” says first Lady Michelle Obama. However, some slaves were hired by the British to burn down the White House during the war of 1812. The British were offering faux freedom to slaves if they would fight for the British oppressors and wage war on America. Some of these slaves wore redcoat uniforms. Jane Cook, the author of Stories of Faith and Courage from the Revolutionary War and The Faith of America’s First Ladies, reports, “Called the Colonial or West Indies Militia, these former slaves were part of the British marines, soldiers, and sailors who attacked Washington. These forces defeated American forces at Bladensburg, Maryland, on August 24, 1814, and arrived at sunset in Washington, where they burned most of the public buildings, most notoriously the White House and the U.S. Capitol.” · Blacks in America have had a much better life in America than Africa. Former Washington Post reporter Keith Richburg, author of the book, Out of America: A Black Man Confronts Africa, said he was lucky that his ancestors came to America, even though they came as slaves. He wrote: “Would I be better off if this great tragedy, this crime of slavery, had not occurred? What would my life be like now?” As AIM chairman Reed Irvine noted in a review of the book, Richburg’s answer, as he viewed the victims of the massacres that took the lives of an estimated million people in Rwanda in 1994, was, “There but for the grace of God go I.” Today, black billionaires in America include Michael Jordan, the former basketball player; Oprah Winfrey, and tech investor Robert Smith. · Black power advocate Angela Davis was a hard-core pro-Moscow communist. A “Black Power” exhibit at the new museum shows black activist Angela Davis. In fact, Davis supported the imprisonment of Soviet political dissidents (calling them common criminals), and was awarded the International Lenin Peace Prize by communist East Germany. She personally met with East German dictator Erich Honecker. She was a former Communist Party vice presidential candidate, and was acquitted as an accessory to the 1970 murder of California judge Harold Haley. · Blacks Are Worse Off Under Obama. Black conservative Demetrius Minor points outthat under Obama, the number of blacks owning homes has declined, the black workforce has decreased, and the median minority family income has declined. Black conservative Deroy Murdock points out that the percentage of blacks in poverty and the number of blacks on welfare has increased under Obama. · Some current black leaders are racial demagogues. The Reverend Al Sharpton participated in the Tawana Brawley hoax, back in 1987, in which a black girl made false and damaging charges of rape against a group of white men. Sharpton was found guilty of defamation and ordered to pay a fine in that case. The Federal Election Commission ordered Sharpton to return $100,000 that he had received in federal matching funds for his presidential campaign after citing financial irregularities. The Reverend Jesse Jackson, who served as an aide to Martin Luther King, Jr., admitted having sex with a female employee and having an illegitimate child. Tommy R. Bennett, who served as Jackson’s personal travel assistant and ran the legal clinic at Jackson’s organization, the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, has alleged that he escorted women to Jackson’s hotel room and was then ordered to clean up after Jackson had sexual intercourse with them. Jackson has denied the charges. Also, Barack Obama’s “former” pastor Jeremiah Wright falsely claimed during a National Press Club speech that the U.S. government had manufactured the AIDS virus to kill black people. · Abortion is black genocide. Minority women constitute only about 13 percent of the female population (ages 15-44) in the United States, but they underwent approximately 36 percent of the abortions, according to the website blackgenocide.org. Pro-life activist Dr. Alveda King, the niece of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., says, “African-American communities are targeted by the abortion industry and too many of our babies die in abortion.” She says, “My uncle didn’t live to experience the horrors of legal abortion, which includes death to babies and harm to women. Today he would have fought just as hard to secure the rights of unborn Americans as he fought for racial justice for Blacks.” She says that her uncle was offered an award from abortion provider Planned Parenthood in 1966, but didn’t accept it in person. She says the reason her uncle was offered the award was to attract the black community to Planned Parenthood. ![]() Celebrating Black Marxist Lesbianism on Juneteenth By Cliff Kincaid Juneteenth, a day to recognize black freedom, will be celebrated this year by the two black Marxist lesbians who started Black Lives Matter (BLM). With fatherless families disproportionately affecting black communities, black Marxist lesbianism hardly seems like an acceptable alternative. BLM’s dedication to the destruction of the nuclear family is well-known but the militant lesbian orientation of two of the founders, now called “queerness,” is usually not highlighted. The National Center for Lesbian Rights honored BLM founders Alicia Garza, Patrisse Kahn-Cullors, and Opal Tometi in 2016. Opal Tometi and Alicia Garza are identified as “queer black women.” Garza is described by her publisher as “a queer social justice activist and Marxist” while Cullors has said, “Myself and Alicia, in particular, are trained organizers; we are trained Marxists.” The organization paid tribute to black cop-killer Assata Shakur, living in Cuba under the protection of the Communist regime there. With a new Pew poll finding that public support for BLM has fallen to a three-year low, we can only expect a steeper decline when the “queer communism” roots of the movement are finally exposed to public view. The poll says, “A majority of Americans say the increased focus on issues of race and racial inequality in the past three years hasn’t led to changes that have improved the lives of Black people.” Perhaps this is because the movement was designed to promote and highlight sexual perversion, a destructive force in communities of all races. Even before the advent of BLM, however, homosexuality was being exploited by the communist movement in America. The May 19th communist organization, a spin-off from the Weather Underground that waged a terrorist war on America in the 1970s and 80s, was dominated by lesbians. These fanatical women, the subject of the book, Tonight We Bombed the U.S. Capitol, operated under the idea that “testosterone poisoning” had saturated American life. Part one is titled "The New Sisterhood." The book, Tonight We Bombed the U.S. Capitol, documents how “most” members of the May 19th Communist Organization were lesbians. One “lesbian collective” vowed to “stamp out” the “Y” chromosome, which signifies the male gender. The author, William Rosenau, also documents that its parent organization, the Weather Underground, “took a hard line on motherhood” and that “women who appeared overly devoted to their babies were reprimanded for a purported lack of revolutionary commitment.” As an example, one member of the May 19 terrorist group was Judith Clark, a red-diaper baby who sought to become pregnant as a “conscious lesbian” without having sex with a man. She obtained sperm from a male revolutionary and was inseminated and gave birth. Eventually, Rosenau says, Clark decided to concentrate on the communist revolution, rather than motherhood, and her daughter was raised “collectively” by other May 19th members. My column, “The Origins of Queer Communism,” documents the Russian roots of the movement and how it was exported to the West under the rubric of “Cultural Marxism” developed by the Frankfurt School. The communists brag about their role. In an article, “Before Stonewall: Queer liberation’s Communist Party roots,” a writer for the Communist Party declared, with justification, that “The modern movement for queer liberation-- or gay liberation to use the as-yet less inclusive terminology of the 1960s and ’70s -- wouldn’t exist without the Communist Party USA.” The article notes the role of CPUSA member Harry Hay, who “set the stage for a social and sexual revolution.” Hay wore dresses, an indication of what was to come. Indeed, Leslie Feinberg, a Marxist member of the Workers World Party, actually started the transgender movement and reportedly said before he/she died, “Remember me as a revolutionary communist. Hasten the revolution!” To understand where all of this is heading, the author of Communism for Kids, Bini Adamczak, writes that more advances will have to be made in the field of “queer politics,” using the strategies of Marxist revolution. Eventually, she says, “modern reproduction technologies” could be used to “completely abolish the sexes.” In this context, two black lesbians are currently featured on the show, Brat Loves Judy, specifically geared to blacks and broadcast on a “black streaming service” known as ALLBLK. In the latest development, Da Brat is expecting a baby with “wife” Jesseca “Judy” Dupart. The father is an anonymous donor. Meanwhile, the influential group, Lesbians Who Tech, is hosting a “2023 Pride Summit” featuring Gretchen Whitmer, governor of Michigan. Described as “the largest LGBTQ technology community in the world,” the group’s events in the past have featured speakers such as Hillary Clinton, Vice-President Kamala Harris, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Melinda Gates, Mary Trump, Rosie O’Donnell, Stacey Abrams, and Alicia Garza of Black Lives Matter. Not all of these speakers are “queer” but clearly sympathize with the lesbian movement. The article, “Ten Black Lesbians Everyone Should Know,” highlights a prominent Marxist, former Communist Party official Angela Davis, who turned lesbian after serving the interests of the old Soviet Union. She received the Lenin Peace Prize and also emerged as a poster girl for the animal rights group PETA. At Brandeis University, she was mentored by German philosopher Herbert Marcuse, an expert in Critical Theory, also known as Cultural Marxism, which was popularized in academia by the so-called Frankfurt School. Under Marcuse, Brandeis University became what critics called a “School for Terrorists,” producing several female terrorists and extremists associated with the Weather Underground, including Naomi Jaffe, Susan Saxe, Katherine Ann Power, and Laura Whitehorn. In another sensational case, Brandeis University graduate Aafia Siddiqui, known as “Lady Al Qaeda,” was sentenced to 86 years in prison for trying to kill American soldiers and was implicated in other terrorist plots. “The formation and growth of the feminist movement have caused radical women to adopt the rhetoric and weapons used by male terrorists,” declared a report from the International Association of Chiefs of Police. Indeed, a “progressive” media outlet called “Truthout” published a column that glorified Aafia Siddiqui, Lolita Lebron, Marilyn Buck, and terrorist lawyer Lynne Stewart. Lebron was among a group opening fire on the House of Representatives in 1954, wounding five members of Congress, in the name of Puerto Rican independence. Buck was another Weather Underground member. She was given early release from federal prison by Obama Attorney General Eric Holder, who was deputy attorney general in the Clinton administration and involved in pardons for members of the Weather Underground at that time. Those released by President Clinton included Linda Evans and Susan Rosenberg, as well as members of the Cuban-supported terrorist group, the FALN. The Obama/Holder Justice Department falsely claimed that Buck had repented for her terrorist ways and called her release medically justified. Buck helped bomb the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C. in 1983 and participated in freeing convicted cop-killer Joanne Chesimard, also known as Assata Shakur, out of prison in 1979. The Obama Department of Justice dropped terrorism charges against another perpetrator of the 1983 Capitol bombing, Elizabeth Anna Duke, who is still technically a fugitive and “wanted” by the FBI. Unlike the lesbian members of the group, author William Rosenau says police reports indicate that Marilyn Buck had sex with black male members of the Black Liberation Army, another terrorist group, and got pregnant but had an abortion. Not to be outdone, the "sisterhood" is planning a June 24 "women's march" in Washington, D.C., mostly for the purpose of keeping abortion on demand. "OUR MOVEMENT IS BIGGER THAN ROE," the pro-abortion decision, they say in all capital letters. "WE WILL NOT STOP UNTIL WE GET EVERYTHING WE CAME FOR." *Cliff Kincaid is president of America’s Survival, Inc. www.usasurvival.org ![]() The Really Big Guy Behind the Big Guy By Cliff Kincaid With the back and forth over Trump versus Biden, we have lost sight of the really “Big Guy,” the former president who was implicated in the Hillary email scandal and was running the Russia hoax. His name: our first openly Marxist president, Barack Hussein Obama. In order to accomplish the destruction of Trump personally, the evidence shows that it was Obama, not Hillary or Biden, who launched the Russia-gate probe of Donald J. Trump. Obama was the real security risk, and still is. To make matters worse, in the indictment of Trump, we find that Special Counsel Jack Smith has a wife, Katy Chevingy, listed as a producer for Michelle Obama's 2020 Netflix documentary “Becoming.” This is important since Joel Gilbert has published a book and produced a film about a Michelle Obama run for the presidency in 2024. The film, “MichelleObama2024,” has many interesting revelations, including that Michelle worked closely with Weather Underground terrorist Bernardine Dohrn at the law firm Sidley & Austin. This is very significant. Before YouTube terminated my channel, eliminating 500 videos from public view, I had analyzed the issue of then-judge Merrick Garland’s involvement in a court case brought by the Obama Administration to drop terrorism charges against a communist by the name of Elizabeth Anna Duke. She was a member of a Weather Underground spin-off that specialized in terrorism, including bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1983, and fake IDs. Then-Judge Merrick Garland found no problem with a magistrate who arbitrarily dropped the charges against her, at the request of Obama’s Justice Department. Garland, of course, was nominated to the Supreme Court by Obama and when that failed, Biden made him Attorney General. We are living through Obama's third term. Which means we have to understand who and what Obama really is. Joel Gilbert’s previous book and film, “Dreams from My Real Father,” explored in detail the intimate relationship that Obama had with Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist Party member suspected by the FBI to be a Soviet agent. Obama covered up the true identity of Frank Marshall Davis in his book, Dreams From My Father. As part of the effort to destroy the opposition to Obama, a Justice Department official under Obama, Jack Smith, communicated with the Obama IRS in an effort to target conservative tea party groups for increasing auditing and criminal prosecutions. Even in the Hillary email scandal, Obama surfaces as a key player. Senator Lindsey Graham notes that President Trump is being treated unfairly and asks, “Did the Department of Justice charge Hillary Clinton for the private server she had in her home?” Good question. But the real issue is why Obama had used a pseudonym in his communications, to protect his own identity, sent over Hillary’s private unsecured email server. What was Obama trying to hide? In terms of the Russia hoax, we learned from the oversight investigations and the hearings that emails between FBI officials revealed that “POTUS wants to know everything we’re doing” and “the White House is running this.” POTUS is Obama. But where was the investigation of Obama? Rep. Elise Stefanik was correct when she said, “This criminal abuse of power went all the way up to the Oval Office where President Obama and then Vice-President Joe Biden were in on it from the very beginning. This was an unlawful attempt by the politicized FBI and DOJ to meddle in our elections.” But it goes deeper than that. When she says, “The entire false smear was manufactured and paid for by political opponents of Donald Trump,” she is missing one key element – the ultimate source of the disinformation was Russia itself. As I noted in my column, “The Russians in Russia-gate,” the observations made by Special Counsel John Durham and his staff indicate the FBI’s corruption goes far beyond political bias against former President Trump. The Russians originated the idea that Trump was a Russian agent and provided the “disinformation” in the Steele dossier which drove the FBI investigation of former President Trump and his associates. But Durham did not draw the logical conclusion that the FBI has been infiltrated by Russian agents and that the agency cannot be reformed until they are exposed and rooted out. In this context, remember it was National Security Advisor (NSA) Susan Rice’s email, which Rice sent to herself on January 20, 2017, claiming there was a January 5 meeting with Obama, then-Vice President Biden, FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates regarding the attempt to frame Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn as a Russian agent. “President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the intelligence and law enforcement communities ‘by the book,’” Rice wrote to herself, referring to the Flynn case. “The president stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.” Rice also wrote that Obama “wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.” Commenting on the significance of this unusual email, investigative writer Jack Cashill told me, “Obama reminds me of one of those killer husbands on Dateline NBC. He scrubs the crime scene down so thoroughly that the give-away is the excess scrubbing, the overwhelming scent of Clorox in the air. The moment he had Susan Rice tell us the Russia investigation was done ‘by the book,’ we knew it wasn’t.” When I interviewed Cashill about his book, Unmasking Obama: The Fight to Tell the True Story of a Failed Presidency, it was deleted by YouTube and, eventually, my entire channel of 500 anti-communist videos was taken down. Cashill’s book accurately describes Obama mentor and father figure Frank Marshall Davis as “a bisexual Stalinist pornographer with a taste for underage sex partners.” The question is whether Davis was Obama’s “real father,” as Joel Gilbert maintains, and whether their “playdates” amounted to child abuse. Such abuse could help explain Obama’s anti-American presidency and promise to mount a “Permanent Revolution,” a Marxist term that describes his agenda of “fundamental transformation” of America. I attempted to put the pieces of the puzzle together in two books, Comrade Obama Unmasked, and Red Star Rising. They tell the story of how Obama came to power and was protected in office by communist operatives in the U.S. intelligence community who were then enlisted in a campaign against President Donald J. Trump. These books document the logical and inevitable conclusion that the most deeply imbedded and covert Russian agent of all in the U.S. Government was not FBI counterintelligence agent Robert Hanssen, who spied for the Soviet Union and then Russia for over 20 years, but Obama himself.
The Living Hell of Gay Pride
By Cliff Kincaid Seeking to escape the irrelevant witty banter on most of the channels, I turned to Oprah Winfrey’s Oxygen network by accident and found a riveting true crime documentary, “Catching a Serial Killer,” on the case of Bruce McArthur. You can bet those behind the on-going “pride” celebrations won’t be highlighting this member of their “loving” community. The subject of a book, Bruce McArthur: The Toronto Gay Village Murders, this sick mass murderer “preyed on men from Toronto's gay community and managed to avoid any detection by carefully cutting the bodies of his victims into pieces and burying them in the pot planters and grounds of his landscaping customers.” He was convicted of killing eight of his sexual “partners,” most described as hairy “bears” from the gay community and known to frequent a notorious homosexual “leather cruising” bar. The documentary reveals that McArthur was also motivated to turn gay by a bad relationship with his abusive father. This is very typical among gay men. Meanwhile, as the viewing public is saturated with ads for HIV/AIDS drugs, the monkeypox virus is the latest dangerous disease to affect the gay community. A study published by the New England Journal of Medicine found that 98 percent of those infected with monkeypox were homosexual or bisexual men. There were some fears there would be a rise in “mpox” cases linked to gay “pride” events such as Chicago’s recent International Mr. Leather convention, celebrating the “leather, kink, fetish, and BDSM communities.” BDSM stands for sex involving bondage, discipline, dominance and submission. Some might say that inflicting pain on others for sexual pleasure is just one step away from killing people for sexual pleasure. The difference, of course, is that one form occurs through “consensual sex.” Biden was quick to act and named Dr. Demetre Daskalakis as the new homosexual National Monkeypox Response deputy coordinator. Peter LaBarbera’s WorldNetDaily story explores allegations that he is associated with Satanic-themed Pentagram images and tattoos and sadomasochistic sexual practices. Before that, of course, the deadly disease HIV/AIDS had emerged in the gay community because of the unnatural manner in which they have sex. Millions died and are still dying. You may recall that President Clinton responded to the disease by announcing a “comprehensive AIDS vaccine research initiative” under Dr. Anthony Fauci’s supervision and direction. It failed and billions of dollars were wasted that could have been spent to treat other diseases. Today, television viewers are treated to a series of commercials advertising various HIV/AIDS drugs with limited effectiveness and serious side effects as gay men hug and kiss or get ready for bed. Even the federally-funded Centers for Disease Control runs these ads about gays at bars and in bed looking for “Mr. Right” and “Mr. Right Now.” The excellent book, The Health Hazards of Homosexuality, speaks about the power of the LGBT lobby and “unprecedented censorship” in the medical profession and scientific establishment about how the gay lifestyle spreads disease and death. In the same way, you can search in the major media for the names of homosexual serial killers and find their homosexuality either ignored or blamed on their conservative parents and churches. But the truth sometimes comes out. The gay lobby condemned Netflix for affixing the “LGBTQ” tag to a documentary about the homosexual serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, even though he was in fact a gay serial killer and met his victims in Milwaukee gay bars. On the national level, both major political parties have gone gay. I gave a presentation, “How the Republican Party is Going Gay,” back in 2015, as part of a conference which also exposed Fox News funding of the homosexual lobby. Today we see how this limp-wristed response has worked to the benefit of those not only pushing transgenderism but drag shows for kids. The next phase is sex with kids. At the time of our conference, I posted two videos exposing how I was nearly thrown out of a gay journalism fundraiser in New York City, as I was filming the event where a male stripper performed for the assembled journalists. The “journalists” were embarrassed. Those two videos were subsequently censored by Google’s YouTube platform. Though touted as “conservative,” the Fox News channel's current LGBT Pride “Celebrating Diversity” promotion on its website even highlights a Fox story about a “transgender teen” who began “transitioning” at the age of five and whose mother says it was God’s will.” The two-faced channel airs interviews with people opposing transgenderism but hired former Olympic athlete Bruce Jenner as a transgender spokeswoman. It’s all about the views and clicks. They cover all the bases, with conservative viewers falling for the bait. In another display of weakness, in response to Biden threatening sanctions against African countries for passing anti-sodomy laws, Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz said he, too, opposed “criminalizing homosexuality” in Uganda, a majority Christian nation. The United Nations Secretary-General, a socialist, also jumped in, condemning Uganda’s “draconian law.” The law doesn’t outlaw private conduct but attempts to prohibit public displays of a “lifestyle” many Christians find offensive. Liberal U.S. media said it included the death penalty for homosexuality, but that can apply only in rare cases of “serial offenders” and those who engaged in such practices as knowingly spreading AIDS. Meanwhile, Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy has said that, if elected, he would retain the Biden policy of allowing transgenders to serve in the military. One such individual, Bradley/Chelsea Manning, was the former U.S. Army analyst sentenced to prison for espionage for his/her collaboration in the release by WikiLeaks of thousands of top-secret intelligence reports. Manning was an open homosexual in the Army before deciding to become a woman. A frequent Fox News guest, Ramaswamy postures as an opponent of “wokeness.” Former President Obama commuted Manning’s sentence, which was originally 35 years in prison for espionage. But when NSA analysts William Martin and Bernon Mitchell defected to Russia in 1960, President Eisenhower labeled them as traitors and former President Harry Truman said they should be shot. Investigations revealed that both young men had been members of the Communist Party and homosexual lovers.
![]() The U.S. Is Losing the World War By Cliff Kincaid Simon & Schuster promotes the Stephen E. Ambrose book on D-Day by saying, “The world changed forever on June 6, 1944, when Allied forces stormed beaches across northern France to beat back the Nazis and reclaim Europe. No book better captures the drama, strategy, sacrifice, and courage of that campaign than Stephen Ambrose’s D-Day.” Nobody doubts the courage and sacrifice. The issue is whether a fascist takeover of the world has been thwarted and the communists have filled the void and won. The men who stormed Normandy 79 years ago saved democracy “and it is all of our duty to defend with undimmed vigor the principles for which the Allies fought,” Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III said on June 6. But Russan communism survived and thrived. “To the veterans of World War II: We salute you,” Austin said. “You saved the world. We must merely defend it.” But the world was not saved. The communists attempted a complete takeover of Europe. They failed but they did take China and launched an invasion of South Korea. Later, they invaded South Vietnam and won. In the meantime, they took Cuba, positioning nuclear weapons for a first strike attack on the United States. President John F. Kennedy forced the Soviets to back down but his decision to liberate Cuba failed because of a lack of will. Under President Reagan’s anti-communist foreign policy, the Russian communists were on the defensive. Reagan liberated communist Grenada and funded anti-communist freedom fighters in Nicaragua. A decision was made by the Russian communists to drop the communist label and forge ahead under the banner of Russia alone. The deception fooled many conservatives in the West into thinking the rulers had given up vodka and returned to their religious roots. In 2014 the Russians invaded Ukraine, a former Soviet republic disarmed by President Bill Clinton’s Budapest Memorandum. America’s first Marxist President Barack Hussein Obama failed to support the anti-Russian resistance with the weapons they needed to retake their occupied territories. Under President Trump, the Russians bided their time. Then, under Biden, they invaded again, hoping to take the entire country of Ukraine. They failed. But Ukraine still struggles to reclaim their occupied territories, as a result of Biden failing to give them the weapons they need to win. Strangely, Tucker Carlson, formerly of Fox News, became an apologist for the Russian invasion and when he was fired, for demoralizing the staff by making disparaging remarks about fellow Fox employees, he became a martyr. At the same time, our other communist enemy, Red China, took Hong Kong with the acquiescence of British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and now threatens Taiwan. Considering all of this, an objective observer might doubt whether the West is equipped to defend democracy, especially when key U.S. government institutions seem more preoccupied with defeating Trump’s return to the White House than the “domestic and foreign enemies” that we see everywhere. As government institutions, even the military, celebrate “Pride” month, our report, “Cultural Marxism and America’s Moral Collapse,” notes the evidence that the rise of the homosexual movement in Britain corresponds with the decline of that nation as a world power. Indeed, David A.J. Richards, the author of The Rise of Gay Rights and the Fall of the British Empire: Liberal Resistance and the Bloomsbury Group, argues that the homosexual movement is a form of “resistance” to the foundations of Western civilization and “imperialism.” What they did to Britain they are now doing to the United States. Mocking the sacrifices of our veterans, Secretary Austin issues a statement honoring “Pride Month,” taking special note of “transgenders.” Started by a communist, Harry Hay, the homosexual movement emerged into public view after the 1969 homosexual riots at a seedy Mafia-run bar in New York City known as the Stonewall Inn. Hay started wearing dresses, became enamored with the occult, and marched for the cause of having sex with children. Biden visited the Stonewall Inn in 2019. In a 2022 Tweet, he declared, “Fifty-three years ago, a movement was born at the Stonewall Inn. Today, we celebrate the generations of LGBTQI+ people who have fought to make the possibilities of our nation real for every American. It is with pride that we continue what they started.” In his proclamation for Pride Month in 2023, he called the Stonewall rioters “courageous.” In so doing, Biden was only following the lead of his former running mate and president, Barack Hussein Obama, once named as America’s first gay president by Newsweek magazine. Interestingly, one of the America’s Survival videos censored by YouTube was how Obama admitted being “schooled” as a young man by a communist in Hawaii by the name of Frank Marshall Davis, a dope-smoking pornographer and pedophile suspected of espionage for the Russian communists. This is not surprising. The “Queer Communism” movement that started in communist Russia was then exported to the United States when Stalin realize the dangerous impact of this movement on his own country. In a strange and timely development, it has been reported that Robert Hanssen, a former FBI agent who was caught spying for the Russians, has quietly “passed away” in prison. Hanssen had been working on FBI counter-intelligence against the Russians for many years while secretly providing information to the Russian government. He should have gotten the death penalty. Congress shares the blame for this horrendous state of affairs. At our June 27, 2011, conference, “Traitors, Spies and Terrorists: America's Internal Security Crisis,” we documented how congressional committees investigating internal security and un-American activities were abolished back in the 1970s. What’s more, FBI directors such as James Comey and Robert S. Mueller proved to be incapable or unwilling to investigate communist and terrorist networks. Mueller, the Russia-gate Special Counsel, blamed al Qaeda’s post-9/11 anthrax attacks on innocent American scientists. Mueller ran the FBI and failed to implement reforms after Robert Hanssen was caught. We tried to warn America. When we released evidence of the Obama-Davis relationship at a news conference in 2008, before Obama was elected for his first term, a Washington Post reporter called our event “a UFO convention” and the Drudge Report refused to run our ads about Davis as “too controversial.” Drudge, once considered a conservative, has moved consistently to the left, so much so that he was named as a member of the “Gay Power 50,” a list of the most prominent homosexuals in the LGBT community, by Out magazine. As we expose the secret homosexual agenda that has even been adopted by the conservative movement, especially Fox News, my group America’s Survival faces even more intense censorship for being in favor of traditional values. The question is whether we can survive the communist agenda put forward by Obama and carried forward by the Biden regime that now includes transgenderism and military-endorsed drag queens. As we honor the D-Day heroes, let’s consider what they would think about what America has become and whether it is worth fighting for.
![]() Why the Marxists Always Win By Cliff Kincaid “I knew it was a good [debt] deal when I saw the lefties screaming.” With that foolish statement, former Director of the National Economic Council under Trump and current Fox Business host Larry Kudlow demonstrated his ignorance of how Marxists create “conflict” that benefits the expansion of government control over our lives. Kudlow buys into the notion of “conflict” being proof that his position is the correct one, when the conflict is being staged to make people like him fall for the notion that the Marxists have lost the battle. In fact, they have already won the war. The war, in this case, is more debt, thus expanding government and shrinking the private sector. This is what House Speaker Kevin McCarthy agreed to. According to Marxists, the essence of economic life is struggle, as conflict develops, and “progress” is made. Practically speaking, this means the coming of an all-powerful government, known as the communist state. As they see it, we are now in the socialist phase, on the road to communism. Even with the original Republican proposal, the Republicans had agreed to spend more money and go further into debt. But the McCarthy proposal is even more of a surrender, causing some conservatives under fire from over-taxed constituents to utter peeps of protest. But these conservatives already voted to make McCarthy the Speaker. They have been played as fools and now have egg all over their faces. Because the Marxists are going through the motions of acting disappointed with the debt deal, it must be good, Kudlow says. He calls them “lefties” when they are so far to the left that they are more accurately described as hard-core Marxists. And Marxists understand how to exploit conflict so their side prevails in the long run. That’s Marxist dialectics. And conservatives like Kudlow are falling for it. Our book, The Sword of Revolution and the Communist Apocalypse, explains how Marxist dialectics has been used by such figures as Barack Hussein Obama and confuses people about the nature and goals of communism. The Democrats have learned a lot from Obama. Consider Obamacare. It was sold by Obama as the “Affordable Care Act,” when it was based on what even the liberal “fact-checkers” admitted was the “lie of the year” – “If you like your health care, you can keep it.” After he engineered the “fundamental transformation” of America, which included the socialized medicine scheme known as Obamacare, the debate moved even further to the left. Congressional Republicans failed to terminate this program under Trump, when then-Senator John McCain voted with the Democrats to save it. Today, Republicans don’t even pretend to be opposed to this Obama-era program. Indeed, in 2022, Republicans didn’t run on the issue, even though it’s a major factor in the debt and spending problems and the massive expansion of government power we face today. This is how government grows and debt rises to overcome the so-called “debt ceiling.” House Speaker McCarthy should have insisted on repeal of Obamacare in his debt ceiling “negotiations.” But he negotiated on left-wing terms, a victory for the Marxists. By framing the issue in terms favorable to the Marxists, the Marxists always win. First, they move the entire debate to the left. In this case, the issue was already framed in terms of expanding the debt. The debate should have been whether to let the federal government default, as former President Trump suggested. At this rate of spending, it’s going to come sooner or later. Biden’s Treasury Department argued that “Failing to increase the debt limit would have catastrophic economic consequences.” Where is the proof? Increasing the debt limit in the past has already had catastrophic economic consequences. We are told that the debt ceiling was created with “the good intention of constraining reckless spending,” as one writer put it. If it’s a true “debt ceiling,” why raise it? Why not, instead, mandate immediate spending cuts? That was the only legitimate option. We are told that the U.S. government would “run out of money” unless the Congress passes a bill to raise the debt limit. The Wall Street Journal claims that McCarthy's deal is raise the debt ceiling “in exchange for spending cuts.” But the cuts are only in the rate of growth of spending. Common sense tells you that raising the debt ceiling means more debt based on more spending. You don’t have to be a financial genius to question this never-ending series of statements threatening an economic apocalypse. Former President Trump had said, “I say to the Republicans out there -- congressmen, senators -- if they don’t give you massive cuts, you’re going to have to do a default. And I don’t believe they’re going to do a default because I think the Democrats will absolutely cave, will absolutely cave because you don’t want to have that happen. But it’s better than what we’re doing right now because we’re spending money like drunken sailors.” But McCarthy did not follow Trump’s advice. He caved, not the Democrats. The Trump position was dismissed when it should have been a legitimate starting point for the debate. Indeed, some would argue that it would be wiser for the federal government to go through a default, in the same way that a bankruptcy allows a company to be re-organized, and that such an approach is needed with the bloated and out-of-control federal government. Remember that, on top of the national debt of $31 trillion, there is the matter of “unfunded liabilities,” estimated at $93.1 trillion or more. The Treasury Department’s own Financial Report of the United States Government says “The current fiscal path is unsustainable.” Under these conditions, McCarthy has agreed to more debt and more spending. The House should have held hearings on a default, analyzing how the money should be spent and for what constitutional purposes. Under these circumstances, the Constitution would dictate that spending on national defense would have to be a priority. Since there’s not enough money to spend on all the rest of the federal programs, unless new massive “progressive” taxes are implemented, we desperately need an alternative form of money that people can use for their own needs, bypassing the federal tax system. To his credit, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has endorsed decentralized cryptocurrencies, over which the federal government has no control. By contrast, Biden favors a centrally controlled digital currency through the Federal Reserve and his Securities and Exchange Commission has engineered a crackdown on the crypto sector. “They want to get rid of crypto,” DeSantis said of Biden & Company. “They don't like crypto because they can’t control crypto, so they want to put everything in a central bank digital currency.” This is what the regime is doing in Communist China, DeSantis noted. What China is doing could be described as the next phase by the Marxists, as we move into full-blown communism, a “financial surveillance state, where they know every transaction that you're making,” DeSantis warned. It should be obvious by now that the federal government has too much control over our money, and that money is quickly losing its value. We need a new beginning, a new revolution, the kind waged by our Founding Fathers.
Has Trump Put Ron DeSantis in Mortal Danger?
By J.C. Hawkins Reposted from The Forgotten Street May 26, 2023 The relentless and vicious bashing of Ron DeSantis by Donald Trump that’s been ongoing for months well before DeSantis formally announced his presidential candidacy has a very disturbing downside. I know it’s Trump’s style to try to intimidate his rivals, but by doing so he’s whipped up a number of his supporters into an unhinged frenzy. He’s also done it in a somewhat juvenile way. This unending litany of vitriol has led some of the MAGA crowd to brand DeSantis as a globalist tool of George Soros, a Bush RINO, a dupe of the Murdoch family, and a fake conservative. It’s all too absurd to dignify. In general, the MAGA movement is made up of predominantly patriotic, good-hearted Americans who only want what’s best for America. But unhappily, there are some folks on the fringes of the MAGA movement who could be motivated to lash out at DeSantis for challenging Trump. Frankly what I’m seeing from the DeSantis haters and Trump Kool Aid drinkers on social media is actually frightening. I think there’s a distinct possibility that an unhinged individual could attempt to do bodily harm to or even kill Ron DeSantis in order to eliminate the possibility of Trump not getting the GOP nomination. What’s even more dangerous is The Deep State could take advantage of the situation to eliminate DeSantis and blame it on a Trump supporter. What better way to get rid of the two biggest threats to the Deep State agenda? Making Trump look responsible for something happening to DeSantis would virtually eliminate the possibility of him regaining the White House. The public outrage would scare off the moderate Republicans and independents needed for a Trump win. He would be thoroughly discredited as a viable candidate. The Elite Traitor Media (ETM) is playing a role in all this as well. It feeds on highlighting the Trump attacks and doing all it can to create a schism in the Republican Party. They recognize Joe Biden’s vulnerability to both Trump and DeSantis. Current polling is virtually worthless this far in advance of the primaries. But it’s clear the weakened economy and Biden’s obvious physical and mental frailty are working against him. I pray I’m totally wrong about this and maybe overreacting. Nonetheless, now would be the optimal time for Trump to dial it back and let up on the DeSantis bashing. He should just stick to the issues and his many accomplishments without building more dangerous hatred and vitriol against his opponent. Failure to do so is courting disaster. As this juncture, Trump is being grossly irresponsible and unworthy of serious consideration for the GOP nomination. His actions are going well beyond the bounds of political jockeying. We all know Trump got screwed in the 2020 election. But he needs to lose his sense of entitlement and victimhood. He must work to earn the nomination like he did in 2016. It’s unbecoming of him to expect a coronation. His actions are leading some of his oldest supporters here in northeast Florida to question his state of mind. If the situation remains as is, I put the odds of an assassination attempt against the Florida governor at 50-50. My years of researching the history of the Deep State tell me the possibility is very real. Should it happen, all the blood will be on Trump’s hands. |